Dr. Fauci, you need to resign. Today!


  
Dr. Fauci, I’ll be brief. I said last Thursday that you need to admit you’ve been fairly ineffective in changing the course of America’s disastrous response to the novel coronavirus (and if you don’t agree with that assessment, see the numbers below). But I didn’t think there was any point in your resigning at that point, since I thought that, by stating publicly last Tuesday that the maximum number of deaths in the US from the pandemic would be 240,000 - without stating boldly that this would require a total lockdown of the country immediately - you had put your stamp of approval on Trump’s current course. When the total inevitably passed that (which it did yesterday. My numbers below show that, if we instituted a total lockdown today, the total deaths from the pandemic would be 258,000), Trump would just claim that he was relying on your numbers, because you didn’t make clear the big assumption behind them. If you resigned last Thursday, how could you possibly justify doing so, given what you’d just told the nation on Tuesday?

But the whole reason that Americans want you there is that they believe Trump will in general listen to what you say, even when it’s not what he wants to hear. However, the fact that he doesn’t listen to you – and won’t in the future – became clearly evident in the press conference yesterday, when Trump again touted hydroxychloroquine as a cure for COVID-19. As you have said repeatedly, there is still no sold medical evidence that is the case, although trials are ongoing. And when members of the press asked if you agreed with him (you were there next to Trump), he wouldn’t let you answer – although he very truthfully pointed out that you had already answered the question many times. Evidently, he’s glad to have you answer questions, but only if you give the answer he wants.

How can you possibly keep working for Trump after this? You need to resign today, so that you can talk freely with the American people about the real dangers. And what are they? Here are some of the numbers from below. These are based on simple projections of current trends (which BTW have been going down, but at this point the only effect of those drops is to postpone Doomsday by a week or so).

Date on which 500,000 deaths will be set in stone*: April 12
Date on which 1 million total pandemic deaths will be set in stone: April 18
Number of deaths set in stone on April 30: 3,603,124
Date on which the number of new deaths on that day will probably exceed the toll of Sept. 11: April 9 (yes, this Thursday!)
Number of deaths on that day on April 30: 80,264



All numbers below are based on yesterday’s reported figures of total confirmed cases, total deaths and total recoveries, published on Worldometers as of about 7 PM EDT April 5. I’m happy to send my spreadsheet that calculates all of these to anyone who wants to check the calculations, although they follow the assumptions described below.

I. Numbers based on total cases, actual and projected
Total US confirmed cases: 336,851
Increase in cases since previous day: 25,214 (vs. 34,030 increase yesterday)
Percent increase in cases since yesterday: 8% (vs. 12% yesterday)
Percent increase in cases since 3 days previous: 37% (vs. 45% yesterday)

“Set in stone” US deaths* over course of pandemic:  258,640 (based on 4% case mortality rate)
*This number assumes a) Total cases grow by 30% into the future (= yesterday’s 3-day growth rate in cases); b) We impose a massive lockdown, with prohibition of all non-essential travel, today; c) New cases drop to zero in 28 days, because of the lockdown, but they continue to grow at the current projected rate up to the 28th day; d) testing is widely available by the 28-day mark; and e) case mortality rate = 4%. To consider a 6% mortality rate, multiply each projection by 1.5. For 8%, double it. For comparison, Italy’s case mortality rate is currently 11.75%.

Projected as of April 13 (7 days from today):
These numbers answer the question: What would happen if we wait seven days to totally lock down the US, based on the assumptions below (which frankly are themselves wildly optimistic).
Total expected cases*: 801,329 (vs. 846,320 projected yesterday)
Total expected deaths set in stone* over course of pandemic: 589,040 (vs. 1,076,775 projected yesterday)
* The expected cases and deaths set in stone numbers assume a) Total cases grow by 30% into the future (= yesterday’s 3-day growth rate in cases); b) We impose a massive lockdown, with prohibition of all non-essential travel, on April 13; c) New cases drop to zero in 28 days, because of the lockdown, but they continue to grow at the current projected rate up to the 28th day; d) Testing is widely available by the 28-day mark; and e) case mortality rate = 4%. To consider a 6% mortality rate, multiply each projection by 1.5. For 8%, double it. For comparison, Italy’s case mortality rate is currently 12.25%.

Projected as of April 20 (14 days from today):
These numbers answer the question: What would happen if we wait 14 days to totally lock down the US, based on the assumptions below (which frankly are themselves very optimistic)?
Total expected cases*: 1,625,701 (vs. 1,997,510 projected yesterday)
Total deaths set in stone* over course of pandemic: 1,248,242 (vs. 2,585,407 projected yesterday)
* The expected cases and deaths set in stone numbers assume a) Total cases grow by 30% into the future (= yesterday’s 3-day growth rate in cases); b) We impose a massive lockdown, with prohibition of all non-essential travel, on April 20; c) New cases drop to zero in 28 days, because of the lockdown, but they continue to grow at the current projected rate up to the 28th day;; d) Testing is widely available by the 28-day mark; and e) case mortality rate = 4%. To consider a 6% mortality rate, multiply each projection by 1.5. For 8%, double it. For comparison, Italy’s case mortality rate is currently 11.75%.

Date on which 500,000 deaths will be set in stone: April 12
Date on which 1 million total pandemic deaths will be set in stone: April 18
Number of deaths set in stone on April 30: 3,603,124


II. Numbers based on total deaths, reported and projected
None of these numbers are changed, since they’re not based on the total case projections.
Total US deaths as of yesterday: 9,620
Increase in deaths since previous day: 1,625 (vs. 1,048 yesterday)
Percent increase in deaths since previous day: 19% (vs. 14% yesterday)
Projected* number of actual deaths on 4/13 alone: 4,134
Projected* number of actual deaths on 4/20 alone: 16,003
* Projected deaths = previous day’s new deaths number, grown by that day’s 3-day percentage growth rate. Note this is calculated completely differently from the deaths set in stone, which refers to projected deaths over the entire pandemic, and is calculated by multiplying expected cases by the mortality rate

Date on which the number of new deaths on that day will probably exceed the toll of Sept. 11: April 9 (yes, this Thursday!)
Number of deaths per day on April 30: 80,264


III. Reported case mortality rate so far in the pandemic in the US:
These numbers are also unaffected by the error I made.
Total Recoveries in US as of yesterday: 17,977
Total Deaths as of yesterday: 9,620
Deaths so far as percentage of closed cases (=deaths + recoveries): 35% Let’s be clear. This means that, of all the coronavirus cases that have been closed so far in the US, 35% of them have resulted in death (compare that to the 4% mortality rate I’ve been using to calculate total pandemic deaths, based on total cases). Of course, this number will come down as time goes on and more cases are closed in which the victim recovered. But it’s only come down by about 4 percentage points since Worldometers started publishing the recovery rate on March 26, and on about half the days, it’s gone up. I’d say it’s much more likely my 4% mortality rate will turn out to be too low, after the pandemic’s over and all of the bodies have been counted, than it will be too high.




Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

How naïve I was…

On March 18, 2020, I put up my fifth post in this blog (this is my 356 th post, for those keeping score at home). I had written my first pandemic post (although I wrote it on my cybersecurity blog ) on Saturday, March 14. This was right after I’d read a really disturbing article that shattered my assumption that the unfortunate incident in Wuhan two months previous could never happen here. I recently reread the March 18 post because a significant number of people have been reading it in the last couple of months, even though I haven’t referred to it at all. Of course, I can’t ask those people why they’re reading it, but what struck me when I reread it was my (in retrospect, of course) incredible naivete when I wrote it. It’s instructive to read some of my statements, a little more than three years later: Since there have already been thousands of deaths worldwide (but not yet tens of thousands, hundreds of thousands, or millions), the battle is to keep that number as low as pos
Read more

It’s all about health care

Over the weekend, there were two momentous events in Washington that will undoubtedly have a seriously negative effect on the health (or lack thereof) of the American people. However, just one of these events on its surface seems to be about healthcare. In this post, I will discuss the one that doesn’t seem to be about healthcare, but actually is. Barring some unforeseen development before then, in my next post I’ll discuss the other event. The former event was the death of Ruth Bader Ginsburg on Friday and Mitch McConnell’s immediate (i.e. about 1 ½ hours after her passing was announced) announcement that he would push through Trump’s nominee before the election – assuming four Republican Senators don’t block that process. Why is this event about healthcare? Because the Supreme Court is set to decide in December a case that would literally overturn Obamacare and cause more than 20 million people to lose healthcare coverage in the middle of a pandemic.   The case is based on a ridi
Read more

The tragedy in India

For a great account of what’s going on in India, read this WaPo article. And read this Atlantic article for a good commentary on how India’s wealthier class ignored the lessons of the 1984 Bhopal disaster and let the health care system stagnate, leaving the country unable to handle this sudden surge in the virus. Although it's wrong to say the system stagnated. For the wealthy, it became (and remains) world-class. Does this remind you of another health care system that, at least in the early days of the pandemic, was overwhelmed?  Both articles call attention to the Modi government’s failures, but they both try to spread the blame around. Yes, others are responsible, but the fact that – after a terrible response to the first wave of the virus – the government got lulled into thinking they’d beaten it, so they could open up completely (including holding big political rallies and allowing the annual Kumbh Mela to take place – this year in Haridwar, which I’ve visited and can
Read more