The picture bleakens (is that a word?)
Note
on May 6: The email feed didn’t work from April 26 through yesterday. You
should have it now, but let me know if you’re not getting the emails (one
should have come yesterday). I posted every day during that period. You can see
all of the posts at https://thepandemicblog.blogspot.com/.
I’ve seen it written a few times that
the novel coronavirus is very different from flu viruses in that it rarely
mutates. Well, that idea seems to be out the window now. Researchers at Los
Alamos National Labs (you know, the place where they developed the atomic bomb)
have identified
at least 14 mutations, including one that seems to be much more infectious than
the current version.
The new strain is rapidly replacing
the old one in some areas, and may at some point account for most of the
Covid-19 cases worldwide. There are some big problems due to this, including:
- Even though
the new strain may not be any more deadly in itself than the current one,
the fact that it can infect so many more people will mean more deaths.
- A vaccine
might be developed, but be ineffective because it targets the old strain,
not the new one. This is why there’s no “one-and-done” flu vaccine – you have
to have a new vaccine every year, which is based on scientists’ educated
guess early in the year of what the dominant strain might be in the fall.
- People who
have been infected with the current strain might not have any immunity to
the new strain, so the idea that there will be some sort of “immunity
passport” is certainly nothing we should count on at this point.
- The idea of
herd immunity becomes even less tenable than it is, if someone who has had
the original strain doesn’t have immunity to the new one. And even the
idea that we’ll be protected when the whole country has been infected goes
out the window. This means that Sweden’s current misguided attempt to leave
the economy mostly open – even bars! I guess they consider them essential
in Sweden – and just take some increased deaths looks even more like a
real mistake. Of course, that was the UK’s original idea, and even though
they abandoned it more than a month ago, yesterday they passed Italy in
total coronavirus deaths in Europe.
So I don’t quite agree with Mr. Trump’s
idea that the US doesn’t need a pandemic task force any more, since we’re just
going to focus on opening up the economy – even though very few states actually
meet the criteria for reopening that Trump and the task force announced 3 or so
weeks ago. The worst part of it is that his strategy is guaranteed not to work. Polls show that a big majority of Americans
don’t feel it’s safe to reopen the economy, meaning that they won’t go to work
or go shopping, whether or not they’re allowed to. It will just mean we’re
spending another month or two not doing anywhere near what we should be doing
to defeat the virus, while it continues to spread and embed itself everywhere
(and this also means we’re definitely going to have a fall wave, which will
perhaps be larger than the current one).
If the prerequisites for reopening
were really in place, including widespread capability for testing (probably 2-3
million tests per day, since many people won’t come back to work until
everybody in their office or factory is being tested at least once a week, if
not more often than that. And a lot of people won’t walk into a store or
restaurant that doesn’t advertise that all of their employees have been
recently tested), then we could talk about it. As it is, Trump’s reopening task
force will inevitably be disbanded in a month or two, as deaths continue on
their merry way (see the numbers below. BTW, a projection used by FEMA has 3 thousand deaths per day in early June, which is almost exactly my current
projection). And maybe we’ll then have Pandemic Task Force II, although I’m
sure the WH will find a more creative name for it.
Note from Tom: I just saw an article in the Washington Post that points out this study hasn't been peer reviewed yet, and some scientists were skeptical of it.
Note from Tom: I just saw an article in the Washington Post that points out this study hasn't been peer reviewed yet, and some scientists were skeptical of it.
The
numbers
These
numbers are updated every day, based on reported US Covid-19 deaths the day
before (taken from the Worldometers.info site, where I’ve been getting my
numbers all along). No other variables go into these numbers – they are all
projections based on yesterday’s 3-day rate of increase in total Covid-19
deaths, which was 7%.
Week ending
|
Deaths reported during week/month
|
Avg. deaths per day during week/month
|
Pct. Change from previous month
|
March 7
|
18
|
3
|
|
March 14
|
38
|
5
|
|
March 21
|
244
|
35
|
|
March 28
|
1,928
|
275
|
|
Month of March
|
4,058
|
131
|
|
April 4
|
6,225
|
889
|
|
April 11
|
12,126
|
1,732
|
|
April 18
|
18,434
|
2,633
|
|
April 25
|
15,251
|
2,179
|
|
Month of April
|
59,812
|
1,994
|
1,474%
|
May 2
|
13,183
|
1,883
|
|
May 9
|
11,354
|
1,622
|
|
May 16
|
13,444
|
1,921
|
|
May 23
|
17,281
|
2,469
|
|
May 30
|
18,438
|
2,634
|
|
Month of May
|
66,549
|
2,147
|
111%
|
June 6
|
21,831
|
3,119
|
|
June 13
|
28,062
|
4,009
|
|
June 20
|
29,941
|
4,277
|
|
June 27
|
35,451
|
5,064
|
|
Month of June
|
130,277
|
4,343
|
196%
|
Total March - June
|
260,696
|
Red = projected numbers
I. Total
deaths
Total US deaths as of yesterday: 72,285
Increase in deaths since previous day: 2,360 (vs. 1,316 yesterday)
Percent increase in deaths since previous day: 3% (vs. 2%
yesterday)
Yesterday’s 3-day rate of increase in total deaths: 7% (This number
is used to project deaths in the table above. It was 6% yesterday)
II. Total
reported cases
I no longer
pay any attention to the reported case number. It is a huge underestimate of
actual cases, which is probably 25-50 times reported. This is because of the
huge shortage of testing capacity. If reported cases were to be anywhere near
actual cases, we would need to be doing 20-30 million tests a week. I believe
the US has done about 6 million tests since the start of the pandemic.
Total US reported cases: 1,238,083
Increase in reported cases since previous day: 29,766
Percent increase in reported cases since yesterday: 2%
Percent increase in reported cases since 3 days previous: 7%
III. Reported case mortality rate so far in
the pandemic in the US:
Total Recoveries in US as of yesterday: 201,011
Total Deaths as of yesterday: 72,285
Deaths so far as percentage of closed cases
(=deaths + recoveries): 26% (vs. 27%
yesterday) Let’s
be clear. This means that, of all the coronavirus cases that have been closed
so far in the US, 27% of them have resulted in death. Compare this with the
comparable number from South Korea, which is 3%. The main reason this number is
so high is that total recoveries are so low. I’ve been assuming since March 26,
when the recoveries number was first published, that it would rise, so that the
estimated case mortality rate (which was 41% on March 26), would be far lower
than it is now. If this number really stays at 27%, this means the actual case
mortality rate in the US is very high, comparable with say Italy.
I would love to hear any comments or
questions you have on this post. Drop me an email at tom@tomalrich.com
"BTW, a projection used by FEMA has 3 million deaths per day" I think you meant 3,000.
ReplyDeleteYou're right, I'll fix it now. Thanks, Unknown!
Delete