White House supports massive workplace testing!
My death projections went up for the
second day, after falling for a few days. A very odd fact, that I discovered
yesterday but have no explanation for, is that there’s a regular 7- or 8-day
cycle in the percent change in total deaths, which has been going on since
mid-March. The last peak was 12% on April 30. Today it was up to 10%, so it
will be interesting to see which way it moves tomorrow. Since the peaks have
been falling since reaching 159% on March 24, it would be nice to think that trend
will continue and the rate will fall tomorrow – but if you want someone who’s
going to replace facts with wishful thinking, you’ve come to the wrong blog.
As I’ve said many times, my
projections below are just that – projections of total deaths, based on the
3-day rate of growth in that number. It would be nice to actually forecast deaths
by multiplying total cases by an estimate of the case mortality rate. However,
there is no good estimate for total cases. The reported number is 1.3 million,
but because of the severe shortage of testing capability that number is around 1/10 to 1/50 of the actual total, based on some other evidence
of the number of people infected.
And yesterday’s “hard” estimate of the
case mortality rate – 26%, as shown at the bottom of this post – is certainly very
high. If we were to multiply reported cases by this estimated rate, we would
expect total deaths over the pandemic to be 26 million, and that’s only if
there were no new cases starting today. Even I think this is really farfetched,
but the fact is that I’ve been expecting this number to come down to well under
10% very quickly, and it’s only moved down from 41% on March 26, when it first
became available.
This – combined with the fact that the
risks in my projections are all on the upside, as states open up even when they
still have growing cases and deaths, and when they still have inadequate
testing capability – makes it hard to believe the numbers below, severe as they
are, aren’t underestimates, not overestimates.
Speaking of tests, there was one piece
of good news yesterday: The White House now admits that much more testing
capability will be needed before people will want to go back to work. As you
probably know (or should know), the vast majority of Americans now think the
current lockdowns need to be extended, not lifted. They say this because they don’t
trust any workplace to be safe – no matter what special social distancing
measures are put in place – as long as someone with Covid-19, but no symptoms,
is walking around the office or factory. Ideally, you would want to test every
worker every day when they come to work (or perhaps before).
Trump and his staff (and some state
governors, and Wall Street Journal
editorial writers, and many others of their ilk) have been pooh-poohing this
idea, saying we won’t need anywhere near that level of testing before people
will feel safe to return to work. But yesterday, they announced that they have
set up a model workplace to test this idea: the White House itself! Because a
butler just tested positive for Covid-19, the WH was quick to point out that
Mr. Trump and a lot of his staff are definitely virus-free, since they get
tested every day (using one of the Abbott Labs 15-minute testing kits, which
are very hard to get, but someone there seems to have some connections).
Of course, we were all very glad to
hear that Mr. Trump is safe, and I would like to modestly suggest that this
model needs to be extended to the whole country. Mr. Trump should boldly
announce that, within say one month, all workers in all workplaces will be
tested daily. And of course, if they are found to be sick, they’ll all be sent
home on paid sick leave (and they will be encouraged to move into a hotel –
paid for by the government, of course – to protect the other people in their
household). And all of their contacts will be traced (you can be sure that all
of the butler’s contacts will be traced!) and tested. Moreover, any contacts
testing positive will themselves be isolated, etc. etc.
Will this be expensive? Absolutely.
But this is what’s needed to get the economy reopened; anything much less than
this simply isn’t going to work, period – that is, unless the government
decides to force people to go back to work by cutting off all of their
unemployment benefits and of course their medical care, since Trump reaffirmed
his intention to kill off Obamacare entirely a couple days ago. Unfortunately he
still hasn’t gotten around to developing his wonderful alternative that will be
less expensive, cover everybody with pre-existing conditions, raise the dead, etc.
– five or six years after he first promised that. But don’t worry, that’s
coming soon, just like the testing is.
So I commend the WH on putting this
pilot program in place, and I encourage them to extend it to the whole country.
Then, and only then, can we really open up the economy. Any suggestion to the
contrary is pure delusion.
The
numbers
These
numbers are updated every day, based on reported US Covid-19 deaths the day
before (taken from the Worldometers.info site, where I’ve been getting my
numbers all along). No other variables go into these numbers – they are all
projections based on yesterday’s 3-day rate of increase in total Covid-19
deaths, which was 10%.
Week ending
|
Deaths reported during week/month
|
Avg. deaths per day during week/month
|
Pct. Change from previous month
|
March 7
|
18
|
3
|
|
March 14
|
38
|
5
|
|
March 21
|
244
|
35
|
|
March 28
|
1,928
|
275
|
|
Month of March
|
4,058
|
131
|
|
April 4
|
6,225
|
889
|
|
April 11
|
12,126
|
1,732
|
|
April 18
|
18,434
|
2,633
|
|
April 25
|
15,251
|
2,179
|
|
Month of April
|
59,812
|
1,994 (= 1 death every 44 seconds)
|
1,474%
|
May 2
|
13,183
|
1,883
|
|
May 9
|
14,847
|
2,121
|
|
May 16
|
20,156
|
2,879
|
|
May 23
|
25,731
|
3,676
|
|
May 30
|
32,406
|
4,629
|
|
Month of May
|
101,287
|
3,627 (= 1 death every 23 seconds)
|
148%
|
June 6
|
39,331
|
5,619
|
|
June 13
|
50,210
|
7,173
|
|
June 20
|
63,235
|
9,034
|
|
June 27
|
76,750
|
10,964
|
|
Month of June
|
264,049
|
8,802 (= 1 death every 10 seconds)
|
261%
|
Total March - June
|
429,206
|
Red = projected numbers
I. Total
deaths
Total US deaths as of yesterday: 76,928
Increase in deaths since previous day: 2,129 (vs. 2,525 yesterday)
Percent increase in deaths since previous day: 3% (vs. 3%
yesterday)
Yesterday’s 3-day rate of increase in total deaths: 10% (This number
is used to project deaths in the table above. It was 9% yesterday)
II. Total
reported cases
I no longer
pay any attention to the reported case number. It is a huge underestimate of
actual cases, which is probably 25-50 times reported. This is because of the
huge shortage of testing capacity. If reported cases were to be anywhere near
actual cases, we would need to be doing 20-30 million tests a week. I believe
the US has done about 6 million tests since the start of the pandemic.
Total US reported cases: 1,292,623
Increase in reported cases since previous day: 29,531
Percent increase in reported cases since yesterday: 2%
Percent increase in reported cases since 3 days previous: 5%
III. Reported case mortality rate so far in
the pandemic in the US:
Total Recoveries in US as of yesterday: 217,251
Total Deaths as of yesterday: 76,928
Deaths so far as percentage of closed cases
(=deaths + recoveries): 26% (vs. 26%
yesterday) Let’s
be clear. This means that, of all the coronavirus cases that have been closed
so far in the US, 26% of them have resulted in death. Compare this with the
comparable number from South Korea, which is 3%. The main reason this number is
so high is that total recoveries are so low. I’ve been assuming since March 26,
when the recoveries number was first published, that it would rise, so that the
estimated case mortality rate (which was 41% on March 26), would be far lower
than it is now. If this number really stays at this level, this means the
actual case mortality rate in the US is very high, comparable with say
Italy.
I would love to hear any comments or
questions you have on this post. Drop me an email at tom@tomalrich.com
Comments
Post a Comment