Can you say “debacle”?
Note from Tom: I made the mistake of putting this post up before the email feed of Tuesday's post came out, meaning that if you read this post in the email feed, this is the second time you've received it, and you never received Tuesday's post. You can read that one here.
President Trump’s planned campaign rally
in Tulsa is shaping up to be at best a disappointment for Trump, and at worst a
debacle that will serve as a shining advertisement for his incompetence and disregard
for the well-being and even lives of his supporters, let alone the rest of the
population.
The big problem is of course that he’s
planning on holding an indoor rally. The rally could be done fairly safely if
a) it were outdoors, b) all attendees (including Trump and Pence, who will also
be there) are required to wear masks, and c) attendees are seated six feet
apart, unless they’re next to someone they live with. However, it’s close to
certain that none of these precautions will be taken (and even if the latter
two were taken, they would be almost moot if the event remains indoors).
Hand sanitizer and masks will be given
out and temperatures will be checked at the door (although it’s just about certain
that nobody will wear a mask, since Trump has turned not wearing one into the
equivalent of a loyalty test), but otherwise the primary precaution that will
be taken is that all attendees will have to agree online not to sue Trump’s
re-election committee if they contract Covid-19. This, combined with the fact
that it’s certain that Trump, Pence and their whole entourage will be tested
for Covid-19 both before and after the rally, means that the only attendees
guaranteed not to suffer in any way from any untoward consequences of the rally
are those two gentlemen (although my guess is that, if a lot of people contract
coronavirus, the waiver – which doesn’t bother to point out that the director
of the Tulsa health department and numerous health care professionals,
including a large group of Oklahoma doctors and nurses, say this rally shouldn’t
be held indoors, period – won’t hold up in court).
And of course, this is the whole
problem: Trump is putting the health and even lives of his supporters at
serious risk, and for what? Oklahoma is one of the last states that he has to
worry about in November. He’s presumably assuming that this rally will show his
supporters across the country that he’s very much alive and in the race for
November, despite the increasingly dismal poll numbers. And it might do
that if nobody gets sick.
But if attendees do get sick, and
especially if a lot of them do, Trump might as well change his campaign slogan
to “Just vote for me in November, then I’ll be fine (health-wise and
economically). If you happen to die of Covid-19 the next day, that’s too bad –
I’ll be sure to find some time to feel sorry for you.” This doesn’t strike me
as a winning slogan.
The
numbers
These
numbers are updated every day, based on reported US Covid-19 deaths the day
before (taken from the Worldometers.info site, where I’ve been getting my
numbers all along). No other variables go into the projected numbers – they are
all projections based on yesterday’s 7-day rate of increase in total Covid-19
deaths, which was 4%.
Note
that the “accuracy” of the projected numbers diminishes greatly after 3-4
weeks. This is because, up until 3-4 weeks, deaths could in theory be predicted
very accurately, if one knew the real number of cases. In other words, the
people who are going to die in the next 3-4 weeks of Covid-19 are already sick
with the disease, even though they may not know it yet. But this means that the
trend in deaths should be some indicator of the level of infection 3-4 weeks
previous.
However,
once we get beyond 3-4 weeks, deaths become more and more dependent on policies
and practices that are put in place – or removed, as is more the case nowadays
- after today (as well as other factors like the widespread availability of an
effective treatment, if not a real “cure”). Yet I still think there’s value in
just trending out the current rate of increase in deaths, since it gives some
indication of what will happen in the near term if there are no significant
intervening changes.
Week ending
|
Deaths reported during week/month
|
Avg. deaths per day during
week/month
|
Deaths as percentage of previous month’s
|
March 7
|
18
|
3
|
|
March 14
|
38
|
5
|
|
March 21
|
244
|
35
|
|
March 28
|
1,928
|
275
|
|
Month of March
|
4,058
|
131
|
|
April 4
|
6,225
|
889
|
|
April 11
|
12,126
|
1,732
|
|
April 18
|
18,434
|
2,633
|
|
April 25
|
15,251
|
2,179
|
|
Month of April
|
59,812
|
1,994
|
1,474%
|
May 2
|
13,183
|
1,883
|
|
May 9
|
12,592
|
1,799
|
|
May 16
|
10,073
|
1,439
|
|
May 23
|
8,570
|
1,224
|
|
May 30
|
6,874
|
982
|
|
Month of May
|
42,327
|
1,365
|
71%
|
June 6
|
6,544
|
935
|
|
June 13
|
5,427
|
775
|
|
June 20
|
5,133
|
733
|
|
June 27
|
5,357
|
765
|
|
Month of June
|
23,582
|
786
|
56%
|
July 4
|
5,591
|
799
|
|
July 11
|
5,836
|
834
|
|
July 18
|
6,090
|
870
|
|
July 25
|
6,356
|
908
|
|
Month of July
|
27,828
|
898
|
118%
|
Total March – July
|
157,607
|
Red = projected numbers
I. Total
deaths
Total US deaths as of yesterday: 119,145
Increase in deaths since previous day: 859
Yesterday’s 7-day rate of increase in total deaths: 4% (This number
is used to project deaths in the table above; it was 5% yesterday. There is a
7-day cycle in the reported deaths numbers, caused by lack of reporting over
the weekends from closed state offices. So this is the only reliable indicator
of a trend in deaths, not the three-day percent increase I used to focus on,
and certainly not the one-day percent increase, which mainly reflects where we
are in the 7-day cycle).
II. Total
reported cases
Total US reported cases: 2,208,707
Increase in reported cases since previous day: 25,667
Percent increase in reported cases since yesterday: 1%
Percent increase in reported cases since 7 days previous: 8%
III. Deaths as a percentage of closed cases so far
in the US:
Total Recoveries in US as of yesterday: 903,136
Total Deaths as of yesterday: 119,145
Deaths so far as percentage of closed cases (=deaths + recoveries): 12%
(vs. 12% yesterday)
I would love to hear any comments or
questions you have on this post. Drop me an email at tom@tomalrich.com
Comments
Post a Comment