Maybe all those empty seats will save us



I was all set to write a pretty pessimistic post this morning. I was going to point out that:

  1. While it’s hopefully not likely, it’s very possible that there will be a new resurgence of infections in the fall. This, combined with the fact that there always is a resurgence in flu infections then, might lead to a more widespread crisis in the healthcare system than has been the case so far in our current “wave”.
  2. Late last March, as Covid-19 deaths were growing at weekly rates of 542% and 690% (in the last two weeks of March – vs. 4% currently), the governors of most of the biggest states did the only thing they could do: lock down their states. The federal government then issued voluntary guidelines for all states, which were observed to some degree almost everywhere. However, there is no appetite anywhere in the country to repeat this experience.
  3. So what’s going to save us from the fall wave if we can’t lock down? There’s no mystery: it has to be a combination of a) massive testing, b) massive contact tracing, c) isolation of cases (not just sheltering at home, where the virus will spread to family members) d) mask wearing, and e) finally having the PPE that’s needed to protect health care and front line workers. Moreover, the only way to prevent a fall wave in the first place is to have all of these provisions in place now, since we need all of them now.
  4. Of course, we’ve been way behind in all of these areas for a while. However, I became especially pessimistic about this when I read a great story in the latest Wired magazine that described probably the biggest obstacle the US has in implementing this strategy to fight the virus: a lack of trust, both in the government and in our neighbors, to do the right thing for all.
  5. I will still do a post about this article because I think it’s so important, but for now I’ll just say this made me more pessimistic, because I couldn’t see any way we would ever be able to turn this problem around with Donald Trump still in office – and keep in mind that he’ll still be president until January, even if he loses the November election. So it seemed to me that we were very likely to be devastated by the fall wave.
  6. This fear was certainly strengthened when I read that during Trump’s rally in Tulsa on Saturday, he had restated something he’d said before: that his solution to the problem of rising test numbers is to slow down testing. And since he wasn’t wearing a mask when he said that, he obviously doesn’t think too much of that either.

However, I noticed in the New York Times and Washington Post this morning a quotation from Peter Navarro, a White House adviser whose main contribution so far has been to actively encourage Trump in his trade wars with China, Canada, Germany, Japan, South Korea – you name it. I didn’t think he had anything officially to do with the coronavirus response that I know of, but given that Trump has pretty much disbanded his task force and stopped even talking to Dr. Fauci, I guess he was the only person who would talk to reporters.

I can hardly think of anything Peter Navarro has said that I didn’t completely disagree with, but he was quick to point out that Trump was “only joking” about testing. That isn’t true of course, but it was good to see him willing to contradict Trump. Moreover, he went on to say that the government was actively preparing for a fall wave (which Trump has repeatedly said won’t happen), including stocking up PPE. I took this as a good sign.

In any other situation, an announcement that the government was taking steps to prepare for an anticipated emergency wouldn’t be a cause for celebration, but given the administration’s deliberate efforts at many times to signal that there’s no cause for alarm by not bothering to do what might be necessary (including the fact that the coronavirus task force hasn’t given a press briefing since April 27, and seems to be meeting only sporadically), it was refreshing to see this.

The point is that preparations are going on in the states, at the CDC, etc. So Navarro’s announcement won’t directly change anything. But it’s encouraging to see someone in the White House willing to contradict Trump, admit we might be in a lot of trouble in the fall, and lend encouragement to these lower-level people doing the actual work, rather than undercutting them at every point.

Of course, Trump’s statements at the rally didn’t indicate any change at all in his position that we’re over with the coronavirus and we just have to get back to work now. And Peter Navarro hardly has the stature of say Mike Pompeo – so he’s far from being an official spokesman. But I do think things may have changed a lot over the weekend, and we’ll see a lot more people contradicting Trump and saying what they know needs to be said.

What has changed? Just one thing: the fact that, according to a Tulsa official, there were only 6,200 attendees at the rally, vs. 19,000 seats in the arena (plus a lot more outside, in a temporary arena that was hastily dismantled when it became clear almost nobody would be there). Trump and his supporters have been talking for weeks about this rally as the “reset point” for his campaign. It was obviously a reset point – just not the kind they were looking for.

Trump’s power has always been the huge loyalty shown by his devoted fans, which was a warning to all officials – elected and appointed – not to cross him. Now that loyalty is certainly fading. Officials will hopefully now feel free to do what needs to be done, and just as importantly to say it. It’s highly unlikely Trump will change his official tune, but as long as hardly anyone listens to him, maybe we can actually make progress against the novel coronavirus.


The numbers
Since my projections of deaths have barely changed from yesterday’s post, I’m omitting that table today. The actual numbers below are up to date.

I. Total deaths
Total US deaths as of yesterday: 122,249
Increase in deaths since previous day: 264
Yesterday’s 7-day rate of increase in total deaths: 4% (This number is used to project deaths in the table above; it was 4% yesterday. There is a 7-day cycle in the reported deaths numbers, caused by lack of reporting over the weekends from closed state offices. So this is the only reliable indicator of a trend in deaths, not the three-day percent increase I used to focus on, and certainly not the one-day percent increase, which mainly reflects where we are in the 7-day cycle).

II. Total reported cases
Total US reported cases: 2,356,715
Increase in reported cases since previous day: 25,946
Percent increase in reported cases since yesterday: 1%
Percent increase in reported cases since 7 days previous: 9%

III. Deaths as a percentage of closed cases so far in the US:
Total Recoveries in US as of yesterday: 980,367
Total Deaths as of yesterday: 122,249
Deaths so far as percentage of closed cases (=deaths + recoveries): 11% (vs. 11% yesterday)
For a discussion of what this number means – and why it’s so important – see this post.


I would love to hear any comments or questions you have on this post. Drop me an email at tom@tomalrich.com

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The tragedy in India

For a great account of what’s going on in India, read this WaPo article. And read this Atlantic article for a good commentary on how India’s wealthier class ignored the lessons of the 1984 Bhopal disaster and let the health care system stagnate, leaving the country unable to handle this sudden surge in the virus. Although it's wrong to say the system stagnated. For the wealthy, it became (and remains) world-class. Does this remind you of another health care system that, at least in the early days of the pandemic, was overwhelmed?  Both articles call attention to the Modi government’s failures, but they both try to spread the blame around. Yes, others are responsible, but the fact that – after a terrible response to the first wave of the virus – the government got lulled into thinking they’d beaten it, so they could open up completely (including holding big political rallies and allowing the annual Kumbh Mela to take place – this year in Haridwar, which I’ve visited and can ...
Read more

The Indian variant

The numbers keep improving every week. Both new cases and deaths grew at the same 0.7% rate in the past week, vs. 0.9% for both cases and deaths the previous week. And average daily deaths in the past week were 573. For perspective, the last time deaths were this low was March 31, 2020. But given that daily deaths hadn’t gone above 10 until March 15, the fact that they’d accelerated to 468 on March 31 was a bad sign (at the time, my big concern was that total deaths would end up in the low tens of thousands. In fact, they passed 600,000 last week). This morning, WaPo ran a story on the new Indian variant’s arrival in Britain, where it passed 2,000 cases recently. It seems to be at least 50% more transmissible than what we used to call the UK variant, but which is now the dominant variant in both the US and Britain. And that variant in turn easily displaced what had been the previous dominant variant in both countries, since the beginning of the pandemic (in fact, I remember a lot o...
Read more

Deaths and Recoveries

I’m not bothering with my usual Numbers section today, since the 1-day and 7-day rates of increase in deaths and cases haven’t changed at all, and the ratio of deaths to closed cases remains at 17%. The projected deaths numbers are close to what they were yesterday. I haven’t discussed the ratio of deaths to closed cases for a while, although I’ve been reporting it. To refresh your memory, this is the ratio of total Covid-19 deaths so far to “closed cases”; closed cases is the sum of deaths so far and “recoveries” so far. The fact that the US rate is 17% means that, of all closed cases so far in the pandemic, 17% of them have resulted in death. This is down substantially from the initial value of 41%, in late March, when Worldometers started reporting recoveries. But it is still quite high – it seems to mean that, if you’re determined to have a “case” of Covid-19, the odds are close to 1 in 5 that you will die. I’ve been periodically comparing the US performance in this ar...
Read more