Why? Here’s why!
Yesterday’s post
pointed to the curious fact that a large portion of the US seems to accept the
current close-to-steady-state number of daily Covid-19 deaths as not too big a
problem (as you can see below, I’m projecting 839 deaths per day in June and
993 in July, based on simply projecting the current 7-day rate of increase in
deaths of 5% into the future).
But the post didn’t talk about Covid
deaths; instead, it described deaths from a supposed rash of airline crashes.
The final sentence was “Of course, the irony of this whole situation is that,
if the deaths were being caused by a problem like a global flu pandemic, there
would be no discussion at all of whether any level of deaths was acceptable or
not. Why do we make an exception when the cause is airline crashes?”
This sentence was of course exactly
the opposite of what I was really asking: Why are we accepting a daily US
Covid-19 death rate of 800-900, when we would never for a minute accept the
same daily toll from airline crashes? I can see three pretty clear reasons for
this, but if anybody else has an idea, I’d love to hear it.
The first is, of course, the belief that
the benefits of fully reopening the economy far outweigh the cost of “living
with” a sustained high level of deaths. I certainly agree that the economy will
never fully recover until it is reopened, but it’s also the case that if the
virus isn’t defeated or an effective vaccine made widely available (which is still
not at all certain), we’ll never have robust economic growth, period. And
the economic situation of the US is likely to slide relative to that of the
rest of the world, since nobody will want to travel to the US and US citizens
won’t be welcome – except perhaps after a 14-day quarantine – in other
countries, perhaps even in Canada.
The second is a certain..well, oneriness
that is part of the American spirit. We just don’t like to be told what to do
unless we see an immediate benefit for ourselves (like if we’re warned to step
out of the way of an approaching truck). Unfortunately, none of the measures we
should all be taking now to combat the pandemic – and the biggest is wearing masks,
which seem to be more and more recognized as a key tool for this – produce immediately
apparent benefits for us. At best, we’ll come to realize months later that we
never got sick because we followed the guidelines. And we’ll never see the
benefits to other people that would accrue if we for example were sick
asymptomatically and we didn’t infect other people unknowingly because we had a
mask on.
But I’d like to focus on the third. I’ve
pointed this out earlier, although it’s been a while: The people who are gladly
“accepting” the deaths aren’t the ones who are predominantly doing the dying. I
really don’t think people at risk because of their jobs – meat packing plant
workers, grocery store workers, health care workers, police officers, etc. – tend
to be terribly inclined to accept a high level of deaths, when it’s clear they’re
the ones who will be dying (along with seniors,
of course).
I made the suggestion at one point
that owners or executives of companies that force their workers to come back to
work (since otherwise they’ll be deemed to have quit and lose their unemployment
insurance payments) be required to work on the “front lines” – the factory
floor, store or restaurant floor, office cubicles, etc. – one day a week. If
nothing else, this would be a good way to ensure that the company was doing
everything possible to keep its workers safe, since OSHA, the government’s
guardian of workplace safety, has decided there’s nothing they can possibly do to
improve the situation, during the greatest workplace safety crisis ever.
And if Donald Trump is so set on having
his rally in Tulsa this week – against the wishes of the Tulsa Director of
Public Health and the Republican mayor (who was never even asked about hosting
the event and doesn’t plan to attend) – and doing this without any social
distancing and only “optional” mask wearing, which means nobody will wear one, he
should withdraw the waiver he’s making every attendee commit to, saying they
won’t sue if they get sick. This is close to the classic definition of chutzpah
– the boy who kills his parents and demands clemency on the grounds that he’s
an orphan.
The
numbers
These
numbers are updated every day, based on reported US Covid-19 deaths the day
before (taken from the Worldometers.info site, where I’ve been getting my
numbers all along). No other variables go into the projected numbers – they are
all projections based on yesterday’s 7-day rate of increase in total Covid-19
deaths, which was 5%.
Note
that the “accuracy” of the projected numbers diminishes greatly after 3-4
weeks. This is because, up until 3-4 weeks, deaths could in theory be predicted
very accurately, if one knew the real number of cases. In other words, the
people who are going to die in the next 3-4 weeks of Covid-19 are already sick
with the disease, even though they may not know it yet. But this means that the
trend in deaths should be some indicator of the level of infection 3-4 weeks
previous.
However,
once we get beyond 3-4 weeks, deaths become more and more dependent on policies
and practices that are put in place – or removed, as is more the case nowadays
- after today (as well as other factors like the widespread availability of an
effective treatment, if not a real “cure”). Yet I still think there’s value in
just trending out the current rate of increase in deaths, since it gives some
indication of what will happen in the near term if there are no significant
intervening changes.
Week ending
|
Deaths reported during week/month
|
Avg. deaths per day during
week/month
|
Deaths as percentage of previous month’s
|
March 7
|
18
|
3
|
|
March 14
|
38
|
5
|
|
March 21
|
244
|
35
|
|
March 28
|
1,928
|
275
|
|
Month of March
|
4,058
|
131
|
|
April 4
|
6,225
|
889
|
|
April 11
|
12,126
|
1,732
|
|
April 18
|
18,434
|
2,633
|
|
April 25
|
15,251
|
2,179
|
|
Month of April
|
59,812
|
1,994
|
1,474%
|
May 2
|
13,183
|
1,883
|
|
May 9
|
12,592
|
1,799
|
|
May 16
|
10,073
|
1,439
|
|
May 23
|
8,570
|
1,224
|
|
May 30
|
6,874
|
982
|
|
Month of May
|
42,327
|
1,365
|
71%
|
June 6
|
6,544
|
935
|
|
June 13
|
5,427
|
775
|
|
June 20
|
5,630
|
804
|
|
June 27
|
5,900
|
843
|
|
Month of June
|
25,166
|
839
|
59%
|
July 4
|
6,183
|
883
|
|
July 11
|
6,479
|
926
|
|
July 18
|
6,789
|
970
|
|
July 25
|
7,114
|
1,016
|
|
Month of July
|
30,769
|
993
|
122%
|
Total March – July
|
162,133
|
|
|
Red = projected numbers
I. Total
deaths
Total US deaths as of yesterday: 117,859
Increase in deaths since previous day: 331 (vs. 681 yesterday)
Percent increase in deaths since previous day: 0% (this number
was 1% yesterday)
Yesterday’s 7-day rate of increase in total deaths: 5% (This number
is used to project deaths in the table above – it was 5% yesterday. There is a
7-day cycle in deaths, caused by lack of reporting over the weekends from
closed state offices. So this is the only reliable indicator of a trend in
deaths, not the three-day percent increase I used to focus on, and certainly
not the one-day percent increase, which mainly reflects where we are in the
7-day cycle).
II. Total
reported cases
Total US reported cases: 2,162,406
Increase in reported cases since previous day: 20,061
Percent increase in reported cases since yesterday: 1%
Percent increase in reported cases since 7 days previous: 8%
III. Deaths as a percentage of closed cases so far
in the US:
Total Recoveries in US as of yesterday: 870,077
Total Deaths as of yesterday: 117,859
Deaths so far as percentage of closed cases (=deaths + recoveries): 12%
(vs. 12% yesterday)
I would love to hear any comments or
questions you have on this post. Drop me an email at tom@tomalrich.com
Comments
Post a Comment