A lesson for the schools
The Washington Post had a very
revealing opinion
piece this morning entitled “This summer camp took extraordinary covid-19
precautions. It still failed.” It describes how a camp in Missouri put in place
“NASA developed” air filtration systems in the cabins. Other precautions
included “documented health screenings; daily temperature checks; highly
qualified doctors and nurses; hand sanitizer in all buildings; limited access
to camp grounds for outsiders; elaborate quarantine protocols; rigorous
cleaning; and stringent limits on touching — even a ban on campers exchanging
high-fives and holding hands while saying grace. Before camp started, campers
and employees also had been urged to self-isolate for two weeks.”
The article continues “None of it
worked. On July 2, with the outbreak spreading out of control, Kanakuk’s camp
was shut down. Missouri state health officials have since said that more than
80 campers, counselors and staff tested positive for covid-19, and camp
officials told families that those infected should quarantine themselves for
two weeks — presumably in homes where their parents and siblings will now be at
risk.” So a camp that tried their best to protect kids and staff ended up becoming
a superspreading event.
However, I can think of one thing that
they didn’t do, that might have made a difference: daily Covid-19 testing of
all campers and staff, with results available immediately. And if the results
were delayed for some reason, the people tested would need to be isolated until
they were available. But of course, this is fantasy. I know of only one workplace
or school in the US where such a level of testing is being done, and that’s the
White House.
I’d say it’s highly unlikely there
will ever be that level of testing available anywhere but the White House,
absent a massive federal effort to get it done. Admiral Brett Giroir, the “testing
czar” at DHS, said on NPR yesterday that by September the administration
expects to be doing 100 million tests a month, because of new technology and
test pooling. On today’s program, though, it was pointed out that there are
already shortages in all of the materials – pipettes, swabs, etc. – required to
take a sample in the first place. Obviously, those all would also have to be
available in huge supply in order for the US to do anywhere near 100 million
tests a month (and the estimate I’ve heard of the level of testing necessary
for the US to safely go back to work and school is 4 million tests a day, which
works out to more than 100 million a month. But even 100 million would be a
great figure if it could actually be achieved – but it can’t).
Who’s in charge of fixing those
problems? Probably not Adm. Giroir. The last I heard (although that was more
than a month ago), it was Jared Kushner, who isn’t satisfied with achieving
peace in the Mideast streamlining government, rebuilding our infrastructure,
and behind-the-scenes making Trump’s re-election campaign a great success. He
now intends to apply those same skills to solving all of the logistical
problems of getting testing supplies. God save us (nobody else will, at this
point)!
So here’s the lesson for the schools: You
can do everything right when they reopen, including following CDC guidelines
and especially installing air filtration systems in every classroom in every
school, and you could still could end up becoming a super-spreader (and of
course, shutting down immediately). If you could test all kids and staff every
day and get immediate results, you might have a good chance of avoiding
this fate.
All this will take is lots of money
and even more good luck, neither one of which is in great supply nowadays.
However, absent such good luck, there’s simply no way almost any school can reopen
and be able to guarantee to parents that their kids won’t become infected with
Covid-19 at school. But Trump and DeVos want them to reopen anyway, so the kids’
parents can get back to work. Sure, we’ll lose some of them (as well as their
family members and friends, who they’ll infect as well). But it’s all for a
good cause: Trump’s re-election!
Breaking news! From WaPo: “We don’t want CDC guidance to be a reason why people don’t reopen their schools,” said Vice President Pence during a roundtable discussion at Louisiana State University, where he emphasized the Trump administration’s position that schools at all levels need to open this fall. (Des Bieler)
Way to go, Mike! And here I said nice things about you yesterday. You never fail to disappoint...
Way to go, Mike! And here I said nice things about you yesterday. You never fail to disappoint...
The
numbers
These
numbers are updated every day, based on reported US Covid-19 deaths the day
before (taken from the Worldometers.info site, where I’ve been getting my
numbers all along). No other variables go into the projected numbers – they are
all projections based on yesterday’s 7-day rate of increase in total Covid-19
deaths, which was 4%.
Note
that the “accuracy” of the projected numbers diminishes greatly after 3-4
weeks. This is because, up until 3-4 weeks, deaths could in theory be predicted
very accurately, if one knew the real number of cases. In other words, the
people who are going to die in the next 3-4 weeks of Covid-19 are already sick
with the disease, even though they may not know it yet. But this means that the
trend in deaths should be some indicator of the level of infection 3-4 weeks
previous.
However,
once we get beyond 3-4 weeks, deaths become more and more dependent on policies
and practices that are put in place – or removed, as is more the case nowadays
- after today (as well as other factors like the widespread availability of an
effective treatment, if not a real “cure”). Yet I still think there’s value in
just trending out the current rate of increase in deaths, since it gives some
indication of what will happen in the near term if there are no significant
intervening changes.
Week ending
|
Deaths reported during week/month
|
Avg. deaths per day during
week/month
|
Deaths as percentage of previous month’s
|
March 7
|
18
|
3
|
|
March 14
|
38
|
5
|
|
March 21
|
244
|
35
|
|
March 28
|
1,928
|
275
|
|
Month of March
|
4,058
|
131
|
|
April 4
|
6,225
|
889
|
|
April 11
|
12,126
|
1,732
|
|
April 18
|
18,434
|
2,633
|
|
April 25
|
15,251
|
2,179
|
|
Month of April
|
59,812
|
1,994
|
1,474%
|
May 2
|
13,183
|
1,883
|
|
May 9
|
12,592
|
1,799
|
|
May 16
|
10,073
|
1,439
|
|
May 23
|
8,570
|
1,224
|
|
May 30
|
6,874
|
982
|
|
Month of May
|
42,327
|
1,365
|
71%
|
June 6
|
6,544
|
935
|
|
June 13
|
5,427
|
775
|
|
June 20
|
4,457
|
637
|
|
June 27
|
6,167
|
881
|
|
Month of June
|
23,925
|
798
|
57%
|
July 4
|
4,166
|
595
|
|
July 11
|
5,087
|
727
|
|
July 18
|
5,303
|
758
|
|
July 25
|
5,507
|
787
|
|
Month of July
|
23,002
|
742
|
96%
|
Total March – July
|
153,124
|
Red = projected numbers
I. Total
deaths
Total US deaths as of yesterday: 139,162
Increase in deaths since previous day: 915
Yesterday’s 7-day rate of increase in total deaths: 4% (This number
is used to project deaths in the table above; it was 4% yesterday. There is a
7-day cycle in the reported deaths numbers, caused by lack of reporting over
the weekends from closed state offices. So this is the only reliable indicator
of a trend in deaths, not the three-day percent increase I used to focus on,
and certainly not the one-day percent increase, which mainly reflects where we
are in the 7-day cycle).
II. Total
reported cases
Total US reported cases: 3,546,278
Increase in reported cases since previous day: 65,545
Percent increase in reported cases since yesterday: 2%
Percent increase in reported cases since 7 days previous: 14%
III. Deaths as a percentage of closed cases so far
in the US:
Total Recoveries in US as of yesterday: 1,600,910
Total Deaths as of yesterday: 139,162
Deaths so far as percentage of closed cases (=deaths + recoveries): 8%
For a
discussion of what this number means – and why it’s so important – see this post. Short
answer: If this percentage declines, that’s good. It’s been steadily declining since
a high of 41% at the end of March. But a good number would be 2%, like South
Korea’s. An OK number would be 4%, like China’s.
I would love to hear any comments or
questions you have on this post. Drop me an email at tom@tomalrich.com
Comments
Post a Comment