Forget about large in-person meetings for a long time – perhaps years
The WHO – under pressure
from a lot of doctors – yesterday put out a notice that transmission of the
novel coronavirus can occur through aerosols, which are droplets that are so
small they don’t fall to the ground right away, and can float in the air for a
long time. This means that just one infected person in a large indoor event can
easily infect lots of other people, if the air is recirculated and not either
replaced with outside air or constantly filtered. One notorious study of a restaurant
in Wuhan showed that a single infected person in a restaurant infected
literally everybody who was downwind of the air vent.
The important lesson
from this is that maintaining a six foot distance from other people (and
wearing a mask when you have to be closer than that) is no longer assurance
that you won’t catch Covid-19 in an indoor setting where there are other people
present, especially if the air isn’t constantly replaced with outside air or
constantly filtered.
When will this end? It should
end when a vaccine is developed, manufactured in quantity to inoculate the
whole world, and given to enough people (at least 70% of the world population)
that herd immunity develops. What are the obstacles to that?
1.
It’s
rare that a workable, safe vaccine is developed in less than five years. Mumps
was one of the fastest, and that was four years. 40 years after AIDS appeared,
there’s still no vaccine. It would be nice if at least one of the 150 or so vaccine
development efforts around the world panned out, but it’s very possible that
none of them will, for one reason or another.
2.
It
would be a massive job to manufacture the vaccine in quantities required to
vaccinate everybody in the world, yet that’s what’s required. No country will
be perfectly safe until the virus is eradicated worldwide – right now the US is
close to the most unsafe country in the world (and don’t count on our being one
of the first to get the vaccine unless we develop it. Withdrawing from the WHO might
put us near the end of the line – thanks, Donald!). And God forbid the vaccine
has to be renewed every year, or even less than that.
3.
But
there’s also the little problem of getting people to accept the vaccine. We
already had a problem getting people to accept measles vaccines for their children,
even though there’s no doubt that they’re safe. How about persuading them that
a product that was rushed through development, testing and manufacturing is
safe? And especially when the White House and many other public figures have
made a cottage industry of trashing the public’s trust in experts like Dr.
Fauci and the CDC – who will undoubtedly have to sell the public on the vaccine’s
safety? Once again, thanks Donald!
Until there’s a
vaccine, I doubt any large gatherings of any type will be considered safe (say
over 50 people, and maybe less than that). Even though I’m sure some
jurisdictions will start allowing them (and some are now, although in the US I
think they should all be banned), the problem will be: will people come to
them? We got a good answer to this recently, when Trump said a million or more
people wanted to attend his Tulsa rally and only about 6,000 actually did,
according to the city of Tulsa. Even then, there have been close to 500 new
cases in Tulsa in the last two days, which the director of the Tulsa Health
Department says is at least partly caused by the rally. One can assume that lots
of Trump supporters really wanted to come to the rally, but they weighed the
risk vs. the benefit and decided to stay home.
And that’s the problem:
What large gathering – a wedding, a funeral, a trade convention, etc. – is essential
enough to attend when there’s a serious risk you’ll get infected there? I
literally can’t think of anything – other than if my one unmarried child got
married, and I’m sure she wouldn’t want a big gathering anyway – that would
make me attend something like that.
And that brings me to
CovidFest 2020 – I’m sorry, I mean the Republican National Convention in
Jacksonville next month. I hope I can discuss this tomorrow.
The
numbers
These
numbers are updated every day, based on reported US Covid-19 deaths the day
before (taken from the Worldometers.info site, where I’ve been getting my
numbers all along). No other variables go into the projected numbers – they are
all projections based on yesterday’s 7-day rate of increase in total Covid-19
deaths, which was 3%.
Note
that the “accuracy” of the projected numbers diminishes greatly after 3-4
weeks. This is because, up until 3-4 weeks, deaths could in theory be predicted
very accurately, if one knew the real number of cases. In other words, the
people who are going to die in the next 3-4 weeks of Covid-19 are already sick
with the disease, even though they may not know it yet. But this means that the
trend in deaths should be some indicator of the level of infection 3-4 weeks
previous.
However,
once we get beyond 3-4 weeks, deaths become more and more dependent on policies
and practices that are put in place – or removed, as is more the case nowadays
- after today (as well as other factors like the widespread availability of an
effective treatment, if not a real “cure”). Yet I still think there’s value in
just trending out the current rate of increase in deaths, since it gives some
indication of what will happen in the near term if there are no significant
intervening changes.
Week ending
|
Deaths reported during week/month
|
Avg. deaths per day during
week/month
|
Deaths as percentage of previous month’s
|
March 7
|
18
|
3
|
|
March 14
|
38
|
5
|
|
March 21
|
244
|
35
|
|
March 28
|
1,928
|
275
|
|
Month of March
|
4,058
|
131
|
|
April 4
|
6,225
|
889
|
|
April 11
|
12,126
|
1,732
|
|
April 18
|
18,434
|
2,633
|
|
April 25
|
15,251
|
2,179
|
|
Month of April
|
59,812
|
1,994
|
1,474%
|
May 2
|
13,183
|
1,883
|
|
May 9
|
12,592
|
1,799
|
|
May 16
|
10,073
|
1,439
|
|
May 23
|
8,570
|
1,224
|
|
May 30
|
6,874
|
982
|
|
Month of May
|
42,327
|
1,365
|
71%
|
June 6
|
6,544
|
935
|
|
June 13
|
5,427
|
775
|
|
June 20
|
4,457
|
637
|
|
June 27
|
6,167
|
881
|
|
Month of June
|
23,925
|
798
|
57%
|
July 4
|
4,166
|
595
|
|
July 11
|
4,352
|
622
|
|
July 18
|
4,495
|
642
|
|
July 25
|
4,643
|
663
|
|
Month of July
|
20,240
|
653
|
85%
|
Total March – July
|
150,362
|
|
|
Red = projected numbers
I. Total
deaths
Total US deaths as of yesterday: 135,828
Increase in deaths since previous day: 945
Yesterday’s 7-day rate of increase in total deaths: 3% (This number
is used to project deaths in the table above; it was 3% yesterday. There is a
7-day cycle in the reported deaths numbers, caused by lack of reporting over
the weekends from closed state offices. So this is the only reliable indicator
of a trend in deaths, not the three-day percent increase I used to focus on,
and certainly not the one-day percent increase, which mainly reflects where we
are in the 7-day cycle).
II. Total
reported cases
Total US reported cases: 3,220,559
Increase in reported cases since previous day: 61,045
Percent increase in reported cases since yesterday: 2%
Percent increase in reported cases since 7 days previous: 13%
III. Deaths as a percentage of closed cases so far
in the US:
Total Recoveries in US as of yesterday: 1,426,483
Total Deaths as of yesterday: 135,828
Deaths so far as percentage of closed cases (=deaths + recoveries): 9%
For a
discussion of what this number means – and why it’s so important – see this post. Short
answer: If this percentage declines, that’s good. It’s been steadily declining since
a high of 41% at the end of March. But a good number would be 2%, like South
Korea’s. An OK number would be 4%, like China’s.
I would love to hear any comments or
questions you have on this post. Drop me an email at tom@tomalrich.com
Comments
Post a Comment