Mitch, it’s (past) time for you to step up!
I hate to say this, Senator McConnell,
but you’re the only one who might be able to save us at this point. Here’s the
problem: There’s no chance Trump will be re-elected, but even then he still has
more than 100 days left in office. And from all appearances it looks like he’s
hell-bent on a course that will end up trashing the country even more than it
already has been, and may result in absolute disaster if there’s a second wave of
Covid-19 in the fall.
The thing Trump wants the most is for
the economy to recover, or at least for people to believe it’s recovering. But his
“solutions” are guaranteed not only to fail, but to make things much worse than
they already are. And there’s no better example of this than schools.
He wants all kids in school five days
a week. Of course, he says he’s concerned about their development if they’re
not in school, and he’s right – not being in school so long is damaging to
children. But he also doesn’t want any school districts to do partial solutions
such as New York City’s, where the kids will be in classrooms 2-3 days every
week – meaning that all students will be in a classroom five days every two
weeks. Of course, that’s the only way NYC can come close to opening the
schools, since there’s no way they could have the same number of kids in a
classroom now, while still at least trying to protect their health.
But Trump doesn’t want anything less
than five days a week of schooling, week in and week out. Why is he so
concerned about this? Because otherwise, most parents of school-age children won’t
be able to work full time, since they’ll have kids at home 2-3 days a week. But
let’s assume he got his way (which of course he won’t), and most districts
nationwide took his advice to ignore the CDC’s guidelines and packed the kids
in schools every day, while Covid-19 cases in most states are rising (if not
skyrocketing).
Schools will immediately start closing
left and right, since if there’s just one case in a classroom, the whole class
(if not a good portion of the school) will have to be sent home for two weeks
to quarantine. When this starts happening regularly, parents will get spooked
and demand the schools close again. So of course, those parents won’t be able
to work again.
And of course there's another problem: teachers. Many of them are older people, and they'll be quite scared of being in a classroom where kids aren't socially distanced, and where at any moment a few of them might be asymptomatically infected, due to the virus spreading rapidly in the community. And even some younger teachers will probably refuse to go back to business as usual, no matter what the school district might want (this is where unions really come in handy!).
And of course there's another problem: teachers. Many of them are older people, and they'll be quite scared of being in a classroom where kids aren't socially distanced, and where at any moment a few of them might be asymptomatically infected, due to the virus spreading rapidly in the community. And even some younger teachers will probably refuse to go back to business as usual, no matter what the school district might want (this is where unions really come in handy!).
This result could be avoided if the
schools reopened in a careful, controlled way – but of course that will mean
admitting that a large swath of the adult population just won’t be available
for full-time work at all. Or at least, until the virus is finally brought
under control.
What do we need to control the virus? We
need to do the stuff we were supposed to be doing from the start: wearing
masks, building up adequate testing capacity (and supplies), deploying an army
of contact tracers, renting empty hotels to serve as isolation facilities for people
who test positive, etc. Experts have been saying this all along, but Trump’s
response has been to a) ignore and publicly trash the experts (as he’s currently
doing with Dr. Fauci); b) say these are all the states’ responsibilities, when
the biggest problem has always been that there was no coordinated national
response; and c) enforce the following message: 1) Everything is going well. 2)
If things aren’t going well, see number 1.
And looming over this is the real possibility
that there will be a fall wave (we’re still in the spring wave, of course) that
will combine with the normal flu season to completely overwhelm hospitals nationwide,
perhaps leading to much higher death counts than we’ve seen so far. Since we’re
not able to handle the disaster we have on our hands now, we clearly won’t be
able to if the second wave hits.
Mitch, you need to a) if it’s a nice
day, leave early and walk down Pennsylvania Avenue (with a mask, of course), b)
turn right when you see the big white building in front of you and go around to
the entrance on 17th St., c) ask if you can see Mr. Trump, and d)
sit down with him and give him the following message: “Every day you remain in
charge of this country’s coronavirus response is another day not only wasted,
but going backwards. We want you to announce that from now on, Drs. Fauci, Birx
and Redfield are in charge of the entire coronavirus response. You will ratify
whatever they agree on and give it the full power of the Presidency; moreover, you
will do your best to rally public support for whatever they agree on. And you
will cease all communication, through Twitter or otherwise, that in any way
undermines what they say. If these terms aren’t acceptable to you, you should
resign and let Mike Pence take over. Oh, and if resignation isn't acceptable, you have your choice of impeachment (irony alert!) or the 25th amendment."
At least Pence’s basic instincts seem
good. He’s hardly the one to lead the country out of the swamp it’s stuck in
now, but maybe he at least won’t continue our headlong plunge into it. Anything
to get us through the next 100 days without destroying both hundreds of
thousands more lives and the economy to boot.
The
numbers
These
numbers are updated every day, based on reported US Covid-19 deaths the day
before (taken from the Worldometers.info site, where I’ve been getting my
numbers all along). No other variables go into the projected numbers – they are
all projections based on yesterday’s 7-day rate of increase in total Covid-19
deaths, which was 4%.
Note
that the “accuracy” of the projected numbers diminishes greatly after 3-4
weeks. This is because, up until 3-4 weeks, deaths could in theory be predicted
very accurately, if one knew the real number of cases. In other words, the
people who are going to die in the next 3-4 weeks of Covid-19 are already sick
with the disease, even though they may not know it yet. But this means that the
trend in deaths should be some indicator of the level of infection 3-4 weeks
previous.
However,
once we get beyond 3-4 weeks, deaths become more and more dependent on policies
and practices that are put in place – or removed, as is more the case nowadays
- after today (as well as other factors like the widespread availability of an
effective treatment, if not a real “cure”). Yet I still think there’s value in
just trending out the current rate of increase in deaths, since it gives some
indication of what will happen in the near term if there are no significant
intervening changes.
Week ending
|
Deaths reported during week/month
|
Avg. deaths per day during
week/month
|
Deaths as percentage of previous month’s
|
March 7
|
18
|
3
|
|
March 14
|
38
|
5
|
|
March 21
|
244
|
35
|
|
March 28
|
1,928
|
275
|
|
Month of March
|
4,058
|
131
|
|
April 4
|
6,225
|
889
|
|
April 11
|
12,126
|
1,732
|
|
April 18
|
18,434
|
2,633
|
|
April 25
|
15,251
|
2,179
|
|
Month of April
|
59,812
|
1,994
|
1,474%
|
May 2
|
13,183
|
1,883
|
|
May 9
|
12,592
|
1,799
|
|
May 16
|
10,073
|
1,439
|
|
May 23
|
8,570
|
1,224
|
|
May 30
|
6,874
|
982
|
|
Month of May
|
42,327
|
1,365
|
71%
|
June 6
|
6,544
|
935
|
|
June 13
|
5,427
|
775
|
|
June 20
|
4,457
|
637
|
|
June 27
|
6,167
|
881
|
|
Month of June
|
23,925
|
798
|
57%
|
July 4
|
4,166
|
595
|
|
July 11
|
5,087
|
727
|
|
July 18
|
5,428
|
775
|
|
July 25
|
5,643
|
806
|
|
Month of July
|
23,407
|
755
|
98%
|
Total March – July
|
153,529
|
Red = projected numbers
I. Total
deaths
Total US deaths as of yesterday: 138,247
Increase in deaths since previous day: 460
Yesterday’s 7-day rate of increase in total deaths: 4% (This number
is used to project deaths in the table above; it was 4% yesterday. There is a
7-day cycle in the reported deaths numbers, caused by lack of reporting over
the weekends from closed state offices. So this is the only reliable indicator
of a trend in deaths, not the three-day percent increase I used to focus on,
and certainly not the one-day percent increase, which mainly reflects where we
are in the 7-day cycle).
II. Total
reported cases
Total US reported cases: 3,479,650
Increase in reported cases since previous day: 65,545
Percent increase in reported cases since yesterday: 2%
Percent increase in reported cases since 7 days previous: 14%
III. Deaths as a percentage of closed cases so far
in the US:
Total Recoveries in US as of yesterday: 1,549,624
Total Deaths as of yesterday: 138,247
Deaths so far as percentage of closed cases (=deaths + recoveries): 8%
For a
discussion of what this number means – and why it’s so important – see this post. Short
answer: If this percentage declines, that’s good. It’s been steadily declining since
a high of 41% at the end of March. But a good number would be 2%, like South
Korea’s. An OK number would be 4%, like China’s.
I would love to hear any comments or
questions you have on this post. Drop me an email at tom@tomalrich.com
Comments
Post a Comment