An Israeli school lesson
The Washington Post had a very
good article
this morning, describing the disaster that ensued when Israel abruptly reopened
all schools – with full student cohorts – in May. There are some very
instructive points in the article for the US:
·
In
early May, the country’s daily new infection numbers had fallen from around 750
a day to under 100. Given that Israel’s population is about 1/100 the size of the
US population, this would be the equivalent of under 10,000 new cases a day
here (vs. yesterday’s number of 48,529).
·
At
first, only students in grades 3 and under returned, along with older students
facing exams. Since young kids are both less likely to spread Covid-19 than
children over 10, and more likely to have trouble with remote learning, this
made sense.
·
However,
the government abruptly decided on May 17 to reopen all schools at full
strength. The reasons were the same ones that Trump and DeVos are using as
justification for reopening US schools at full strength: the need to get the economy
growing again (although I just read yesterday that manufacturing continues to
grow in the US. Evidently manufacturers have figured out how to reopen safely,
since otherwise the workers wouldn’t be there).
·
Meanwhile,
the rest of the country had already reopened – e.g. people were flooding to
malls, bars and restaurants.
·
To
quote the article “That same day, a mother phoned a teacher at Jerusalem’s
historic Gymnasia Ha’ivrit high school. Her son, a seventh-grade student there,
had tested positive for the virus. By the next day, the school confirmed
another case in the ninth grade. Ultimately, Israeli officials said, 154
students and 26 staff members were found to be infected.”
·
“The
Education Ministry had issued safety instructions: Masks were to be worn by
students in fourth grade and higher, windows kept open, hands washed frequently
and students kept six feet apart whenever possible. But in many Israeli
schools, where up to 38 children squeeze into classrooms of about 500 square
feet, physical distancing proved impossible.”
·
“Then
a heat wave hit. Parents complained that it was inhumane to make children wear
masks in steaming classrooms where open windows nullified the air conditioning.
In response, the government exempted everyone from wearing masks for four days,
and schools shut the windows.
·
“That
decision proved disastrous, experts say. “Instead of canceling school in those
days, they just told the kids ‘OK, well you have to stay in the class with the
air conditioning on and take your masks off,’ so you have no ventilation
really,” said Dr. Ronit Calderon-Margalit, a professor of epidemiology at
Hebrew University-Hadassah Braun School of Public Health. “You have the ideal
circumstances for an outbreak.””
·
“Seeking
to contain the contagion, the Education Ministry vowed to shut any school with
even one Covid-19 case. It ultimately closed more than 240 schools and
quarantined more than 22,520 teachers and students. When the school year ended
in late June, the ministry said, 977 pupils and teachers had contracted
Covid-19. But the Health Ministry, lacking the infrastructure and resources,
did not make contact tracing a priority. In the Gymnasia case, Professor Waxman
said, nobody even identified which buses the students had ridden on to school.”
·
At
least one teacher died (again, that would be like 100 dying in the US).
·
By
late July, 2,000 people were being infected every day, which is like 200,000 in
the US – in other words, Israel is currently worse on a per capita basis
than the US. While the superspreading event at the high school didn’t help the
problem, it’s certainly true that reopening the schools isn’t by itself
responsible for the whole problem.
·
“Public
health experts worldwide have coalesced around a set of guidelines for
reopening schools. A major recommendation is to create groups of 10 to 15
students who stay together in classrooms, at recess and lunchtime, with
teachers assigned to only one group. Each group has minimal contact with other
groups, limiting any spread of infection. And if a case of Covid-19 emerges,
one group can be quarantined at home while others can continue at school.
·
“Other
key recommendations include staggering schedules or teaching older students
online, keeping desks several feet apart, sanitizing classrooms more
frequently, providing ventilation and opening windows if possible, and
requiring masks for staff and students old enough to wear them properly.”
The main takeaway for me from this
story is that, if the schools had simply continued their effort to reopen on an
incremental basis, and if they had resisted doing something really dumb like
shutting the windows and dropping the mask requirement during the heat wave,
rather than simply closing the schools, they might have at least avoided the
outcome of people seeing the schools reopening as a debacle.
If we want to avoid that, we need to
do the same thing. If we don’t listen to Trump and some governors who advocate
for total reopening, but we do something like New York, where they are essentially
opening at half strength – and they’re only doing this because their case
growth numbers have dropped significantly – we can at least have a situation
where there’s incremental progress being made toward opening schools fully. So
maybe next year they really can be reopened fully.
But only if the virus is finally controlled.
Otherwise, they’ll never reopen fully. Nor will the economy.
The
numbers
These
numbers are updated every day, based on reported US Covid-19 deaths the day
before (taken from the Worldometers.info site, where I’ve been getting my
numbers all along). No other variables go into the projected numbers – they are
all projections based on yesterday’s 7-day rate of increase in total Covid-19
deaths, which was 5%.
Note
that the “accuracy” of the projected numbers diminishes greatly after 3-4
weeks. This is because, up until 3-4 weeks, deaths could in theory be predicted
very accurately, if one knew the real number of cases. In other words, the
people who are going to die in the next 3-4 weeks of Covid-19 are already sick
with the disease, even though they may not know it yet. But this means that the
trend in deaths should be some indicator of the level of infection 3-4 weeks
previous.
However,
once we get beyond 3-4 weeks, deaths become more and more dependent on policies
and practices that are put in place – or removed, as is more the case nowadays
- after today (as well as other factors like the widespread availability of an
effective treatment, if not a real “cure”). Yet I still think there’s value in
just trending out the current rate of increase in deaths, since it gives some
indication of what will happen in the near term if there are no significant
intervening changes.
Week ending
|
Deaths reported during week/month
|
Avg. deaths per day during
week/month
|
Deaths as percentage of previous month’s
|
March 7
|
18
|
3
|
|
March 14
|
38
|
5
|
|
March 21
|
244
|
35
|
|
March 28
|
1,928
|
275
|
|
Month of March
|
4,058
|
131
|
|
April 4
|
6,225
|
889
|
|
April 11
|
12,126
|
1,732
|
|
April 18
|
18,434
|
2,633
|
|
April 25
|
15,251
|
2,179
|
|
Month of April
|
59,812
|
1,994
|
1,474%
|
May 2
|
13,183
|
1,883
|
|
May 9
|
12,592
|
1,799
|
|
May 16
|
10,073
|
1,439
|
|
May 23
|
8,570
|
1,224
|
|
May 30
|
6,874
|
982
|
|
Month of May
|
42,327
|
1,365
|
71%
|
June 6
|
6,544
|
935
|
|
June 13
|
5,427
|
775
|
|
June 20
|
4,457
|
637
|
|
June 27
|
6,167
|
881
|
|
Month of June
|
23,925
|
798
|
57%
|
July 4
|
4,166
|
595
|
|
July 11
|
5,087
|
727
|
|
July 18
|
5,476
|
782
|
|
July 25
|
6,971
|
996
|
|
Month of July
|
26,649
|
860
|
111%
|
August 1
|
8,069
|
1,153
|
|
August 8
|
8,306
|
1,187
|
|
August 15
|
8,743
|
1,249
|
|
August 22
|
9,202
|
1,315
|
|
August 29
|
9,686
|
1,384
|
|
Month of August
|
38,371
|
1,238
|
144%
|
Total March – August
|
195,142
|
|
|
Red = projected numbers
I. Total deaths
Total US deaths as of yesterday: 158,968
Deaths reported yesterday: 593
Yesterday’s 7-day rate of increase in total deaths: 5% (This number
is used to project deaths in the table above; it was 5% two days ago. There is
a 7-day cycle in the reported deaths numbers, caused by lack of reporting over
the weekends from closed state offices. So this is the only reliable indicator
of a trend in deaths, not the three-day percent increase I used to focus on,
and certainly not the one-day percent increase, which mainly reflects where we
are in the 7-day cycle).
II. Total
reported cases
Total US reported cases: 4,862,513
Increase in reported cases since previous day: 48,529
Percent increase in reported cases since 7 days previous: 10%
III. Deaths as a percentage of closed cases so far
in the US:
Total Recoveries in US as of yesterday: 2,448,295
Total Deaths as of yesterday: 158,968
Deaths so far as percentage of closed cases (=deaths + recoveries): 6%
For a
discussion of what this number means – and why it’s so important – see this post. Short
answer: If this percentage declines, that’s good. It’s been steadily declining since
a high of 41% at the end of March. But a good number would be 2%, like South
Korea’s. An OK number would be 4%, like China’s.
I would love to hear any comments or
questions you have on this post. Drop me an email at tom@tomalrich.com
Comments
Post a Comment