In case you think that wearing masks is some liberal plot…
Last
week, Kevin Perry called my attention to this
news story from South Korea, which has lately been having a “surge” in Covid-19
cases, although in their case that means 19,699 cases and 323 deaths so far in
the pandemic. Even if you adjust for the fact that their population is a little
less than one sixth of ours, they’re still far ahead of us in terms of their
virus response – even though they never closed their border with China (they
simply couldn’t). We’re now averaging about 40,000 new cases and 1,000 deaths every
day.
The
story is that a lady who happened to be infected (and was presumably still
asymptomatic) walked into a Starbucks and sat down under the air conditioner.
That meant her exhaled droplets spread all over the store, not just in the
six-foot space around her. She ended up infecting at least 56 people. This isn’t
unprecedented, of course, but the important fact is that most of the other
customers weren’t wearing masks all the time, since of course you can’t drink
that way.
The
only people in the store who consistently wore masks while she was there were
the four staff members. And guess what? None of them were infected.
I’m
sure this finding could have been reached earlier if there had been scientific
studies, where an infected person sits under an air conditioner and half the
customers are masked vs. half not masked. But of course that would be
unethical. However, the “experiment” has now been done. Anyone who doesn’t pay
attention to this is a fool.
Speaking
of fools, I wonder if our president has read this story?
The numbers
These numbers are updated
every day, based on reported US Covid-19 deaths the day before (taken from the
Worldometers.info site, where I’ve been getting my numbers all along). No other
variables go into the projected numbers – they are all projections based on
yesterday’s 7-day rate of increase in total Covid-19 deaths, which was 4%.
Note that the “accuracy”
of the projected numbers diminishes greatly after 3-4 weeks. This is because,
up until 3-4 weeks, deaths could in theory be predicted very accurately, if one
knew the real number of cases. In other words, the people who are going to die
in the next 3-4 weeks of Covid-19 are already sick with the disease, even
though they may not know it yet. But this means that the trend in deaths should
be some indicator of the level of infection 3-4 weeks previous.
However, once we get beyond
3-4 weeks, deaths become more and more dependent on policies and practices that
are put in place – or removed, as is more the case nowadays - after today (as
well as other factors like the widespread availability of an effective treatment,
if not a real “cure”). Yet I still think there’s value in just trending out the
current rate of increase in deaths, since it gives some indication of what will
happen in the near term if there are no significant intervening changes.
Week
ending
|
Deaths
reported during week/month
|
Avg.
deaths per day during week/month
|
Deaths as
percentage of previous month’s
|
March 7
|
18
|
3
|
|
March 14
|
38
|
5
|
|
March 21
|
244
|
35
|
|
March 28
|
1,928
|
275
|
|
Month of
March
|
4,058
|
131
|
|
April 4
|
6,225
|
889
|
|
April 11
|
12,126
|
1,732
|
|
April 18
|
18,434
|
2,633
|
|
April 25
|
15,251
|
2,179
|
|
Month of
April
|
59,812
|
1,994
|
1,474%
|
May 2
|
13,183
|
1,883
|
|
May 9
|
12,592
|
1,799
|
|
May 16
|
10,073
|
1,439
|
|
May 23
|
8,570
|
1,224
|
|
May 30
|
6,874
|
982
|
|
Month of
May
|
42,327
|
1,365
|
71%
|
June 6
|
6,544
|
935
|
|
June 13
|
5,427
|
775
|
|
June 20
|
4,457
|
637
|
|
June 27
|
6,167
|
881
|
|
Month of
June
|
23,925
|
798
|
57%
|
July 4
|
4,166
|
595
|
|
July 11
|
5,087
|
727
|
|
July 18
|
5,476
|
782
|
|
July 25
|
6,971
|
996
|
|
Month of July
|
26,649
|
860
|
111%
|
August 1
|
8,069
|
1,153
|
|
August 8
|
7,153
|
1,022
|
|
August 15
|
7,556
|
1,079
|
|
August 22
|
7,552
|
1,079
|
|
August 29
|
6,675
|
954
|
|
Month of August
|
31,117
|
1,004
|
117%
|
September
5
|
6,922
|
989
|
|
September
12
|
7,179
|
1,026
|
|
September
19
|
7,445
|
1,064
|
|
September
26
|
7,720
|
1,103
|
|
Month
of Sept.
|
31,136
|
1,038
|
100%
|
Total
March – September
|
219,024
|
|
|
Red = projected
numbers
I. Total deaths
Total US deaths as of
yesterday: 186,857
Deaths reported yesterday:
872
Yesterday’s 7-day rate of
increase in total deaths: 4% (This number is used to project deaths in the table
above; it was 4% two days ago. There is a 7-day cycle in the reported deaths
numbers, caused by lack of reporting over the weekends from closed state
offices. So this is the only reliable indicator of a trend in deaths, not the three-day
percent increase I used to focus on, and certainly not the one-day percent
increase, which mainly reflects where we are in the 7-day cycle).
II. Total reported cases
Total US reported cases: 6,139,467
Increase in reported cases
since previous day: 42,041
Percent increase in reported
cases since 7 days previous: 5%
III. Deaths as a percentage of closed cases so far in the US:
Total Recoveries in US as
of yesterday: 3,408,908
Total Deaths as of yesterday:
186,857
Deaths so far as
percentage of closed cases (=deaths + recoveries): 5%
For a discussion of what this number means – and why
it’s so important – see this post. Short
answer: If this percentage declines, that’s good. It’s been steadily declining since
a high of 41% at the end of March. But a good number would be 2%, like South
Korea’s. An OK number would be 4%, like China’s.
IV. 7-day average of
test positive rate for US: 5.9%
For
comparison, the recent peak for this rate was 27% in late July, although the peak
in late March was 75%. This is published by Johns Hopkins (recent rates for New
York state: .8%. For Texas: 15.8%. For Florida: 14.5%. For Arizona: 8.6%).
I
would love to hear any comments or questions you have on this post. Drop me an
email at tom@tomalrich.com
Comments
Post a Comment