Our slide into the pit continues! But at least we're not diving in...
I always show rates of increase
rounded to a whole number, when in fact they’re calculated to a number of
decimal points by Excel. Since the projections of deaths are based on the exact
number, this means there can be large changes in my projections, even though
the rounded 7-day rate of increase in total deaths looks like it didn’t change.
That’s what happened between my projections
yesterday vs. those today. The rounded 7-day rate of increase in total deaths
remained at 5%, but the projected deaths for the month of August jumped from
35,377 yesterday to 39,535 today. This was just continuation of a trend. On
July 11, with the rate at 3%, I projected “just” 21,257 deaths for August.
However, that projection is still far
lower than the actual number of deaths for April, which was 59,812. Why is it
so much lower, since the total number of cases is more than four times higher
now than at the end of April (and by the end of August it will easily be five
or even six times higher)? I think the answer is in the last number I track: deaths
as a percentage of closed cases – i.e. the percent of cases that end with the
person dying.
At the end of April, that number was
29%, whereas it’s 6% today. What accounts for that change? I can think of
several reasons. There are undoubtedly others.
1.
Hospitals
are less overcrowded in general than they were in April, even though the virus
has come back hard in states like Florida, Texas and Arizona.
2.
Techniques
for treating infections have obviously improved, and probably widespread use of
remdesivir has helped.
3.
People
getting infected are on average younger (in part because we seem to have
finally figured out that we need to focus lots of resources on nursing homes,
as evidently Florida has), and they’re much less likely to die than older
people.
If the percentage hadn’t changed (i.e.
it had remained at 29%), I would be projecting 965,236 deaths
in August. Maybe the 39,535 I’m projecting now isn’t so bad (although it will
likely go up, not down), compared to 965,000. That may be so, but on July 11,
the projection was 21,000, meaning we’ll probably have at least 20,000
additional deaths in August (and more in subsequent months) - simply because we
let the coronavirus spread out of control again, after it seemed to be almost under
control in early June.
The point is that this shouldn’t be
happening to us. Lots of other countries are also experiencing new “waves” (for
example, Vietnam, after going for a couple months with literally zero new cases,
found a few new cases in the city of DaNang not more than a week ago, and today
has 600 cases – up from about 30 yesterday). But they are in a position to be
able to contain outbreaks through testing, contact tracing and isolation (for
example, Vietnam will test the entire population of DaNang, which is over a
million people, and will isolate anybody who is infected for 14 days – not just
tell them to stay at home where they’ll infect their families).
Yet we’re way behind on testing. And
even if we had the contact tracers we need, their efforts are fruitless if it
takes more than three days to get test results, as Dr. Fauci pointed out
recently. Meanwhile, Admiral Giroir, the latest official in charge of making
excuses for having inadequate testing (there have been a whole string of those,
including the president, Jared Kushner, and Deborah Birx), admitted that the US
can’t guarantee a 3-day turnaround for test results now, after recently
sounding very rosy on the prospect of finally achieving an adequate level of testing.
So even though we’re doing over 800,000
tests a day now, we would need to be doing at least three or four times that in
order to be able to rapidly isolate any new outbreaks. As it has been since
early February, the continuing inability of the US to have adequate testing,
tracing and isolating capacity is a disgrace. It is literally killing lots of
Americans, as well as making us the object of pity for the rest of the world. Somehow,
it wasn’t supposed to be this way…
The
numbers
These
numbers are updated every day, based on reported US Covid-19 deaths the day
before (taken from the Worldometers.info site, where I’ve been getting my
numbers all along). No other variables go into the projected numbers – they are
all projections based on yesterday’s 7-day rate of increase in total Covid-19
deaths, which was 5%.
Note
that the “accuracy” of the projected numbers diminishes greatly after 3-4
weeks. This is because, up until 3-4 weeks, deaths could in theory be predicted
very accurately, if one knew the real number of cases. In other words, the
people who are going to die in the next 3-4 weeks of Covid-19 are already sick
with the disease, even though they may not know it yet. But this means that the
trend in deaths should be some indicator of the level of infection 3-4 weeks
previous.
However,
once we get beyond 3-4 weeks, deaths become more and more dependent on policies
and practices that are put in place – or removed, as is more the case nowadays
- after today (as well as other factors like the widespread availability of an
effective treatment, if not a real “cure”). Yet I still think there’s value in
just trending out the current rate of increase in deaths, since it gives some
indication of what will happen in the near term if there are no significant
intervening changes.
Week ending
|
Deaths reported during week/month
|
Avg. deaths per day during
week/month
|
Deaths as percentage of previous month’s
|
March 7
|
18
|
3
|
|
March 14
|
38
|
5
|
|
March 21
|
244
|
35
|
|
March 28
|
1,928
|
275
|
|
Month of March
|
4,058
|
131
|
|
April 4
|
6,225
|
889
|
|
April 11
|
12,126
|
1,732
|
|
April 18
|
18,434
|
2,633
|
|
April 25
|
15,251
|
2,179
|
|
Month of April
|
59,812
|
1,994
|
1,474%
|
May 2
|
13,183
|
1,883
|
|
May 9
|
12,592
|
1,799
|
|
May 16
|
10,073
|
1,439
|
|
May 23
|
8,570
|
1,224
|
|
May 30
|
6,874
|
982
|
|
Month of May
|
42,327
|
1,365
|
71%
|
June 6
|
6,544
|
935
|
|
June 13
|
5,427
|
775
|
|
June 20
|
4,457
|
637
|
|
June 27
|
6,167
|
881
|
|
Month of June
|
23,925
|
798
|
57%
|
July 4
|
4,166
|
595
|
|
July 11
|
5,087
|
727
|
|
July 18
|
5,476
|
782
|
|
July 25
|
6,971
|
996
|
|
Month of July
|
26,649
|
860
|
111%
|
August 1
|
8,069
|
1,153
|
|
August 8
|
8,503
|
1,215
|
|
August 15
|
8,961
|
1,280
|
|
August 22
|
9,444
|
1,359
|
|
August 29
|
9,952
|
1,422
|
|
Month of August
|
39,535
|
1,275
|
148%
|
Total March – August
|
196,306
|
|
|
I. Total
deaths
Total US deaths as of yesterday: 157,921
Deaths reported yesterday: 1,149
Yesterday’s 7-day rate of increase in total deaths: 5% (This number
is used to project deaths in the table above; it was 5% two days ago. There is
a 7-day cycle in the reported deaths numbers, caused by lack of reporting over
the weekends from closed state offices. So this is the only reliable indicator
of a trend in deaths, not the three-day percent increase I used to focus on,
and certainly not the one-day percent increase, which mainly reflects where we
are in the 7-day cycle).
II. Total
reported cases
Total US reported cases: 4,765,155
Increase in reported cases since previous day: 57,754
Percent increase in reported cases since 7 days previous: 9%
III. Deaths as a percentage of closed cases so far
in the US:
Total Recoveries in US as of yesterday: 2,363,165
Total Deaths as of yesterday: 157,921
Deaths so far as percentage of closed cases (=deaths + recoveries): 6%
For a
discussion of what this number means – and why it’s so important – see this post. Short
answer: If this percentage declines, that’s good. It’s been steadily declining since
a high of 41% at the end of March. But a good number would be 2%, like South
Korea’s. An OK number would be 4%, like China’s.
I would love to hear any comments or
questions you have on this post. Drop me an email at tom@tomalrich.com
Comments
Post a Comment