Two school lessons from Georgia
The first week of classes in many
school districts hasn’t gone well; there have been lots of cases reported, leading
to students and teachers who were in contact with the person being sent home
for 14 days to quarantine. Moreover, some entire schools have shut down because
there were too many cases among students or staff. In Georgia’s Gwinnett County
School District (in metropolitan Atlanta), 260 staff members have been ordered
to stay home because they tested positive for Covid-19.
That this is happening shouldn’t be a
surprise to anyone except those who don’t pay any attention to the experts or
science – which unfortunately includes the US President and the Secretary of
Education. If cases are increasing in a community, or if they’re at a high
level and not decreasing, it will be virtually impossible to avoid widespread
shutdowns of classrooms and schools. Again, to fix education (and the economy, of
course), we have to first fix the virus. This is the first lesson from Georgia
(and really, lots of other states as well).
The second lesson comes from North
Paulding High School in Dallas, GA, and was reported
in WaPo. Two students shared photos on social media of crowded hallways
with almost universally maskless students. Faced with this evidence that the school’s
reopening is way out of compliance with the CDC’s guidelines, the school
administration took immediate, decisive action.
Does that mean administrators took
steps to come into compliance with CDC guidelines, including requiring masks
and figuring out a way for students not to have to crowd the hallways at the
same time six or seven times a day? Certainly not: They suspended the two
students! Paulding County Schools Superintendent pointed out in a letter to parents
that “the images ‘didn’t look good’. But he argued that they lacked context
about the 2,000-plus student school, where masks are a ‘personal choice’.”
This is quite an interesting argument.
The Superintendent is admitting that the schools aren’t providing a safe
environment for their students as they’re supposed to (and as they certainly
promised the parents, at least I hope so), but they have to let students do
what they want because they’re not violating any government order. I seem to
remember from high school that administrators did what they thought was
necessary to maintain discipline, protect students, etc. – they didn’t limit
themselves to just enforcing the criminal code. I guess things are different
nowadays.
Meanwhile, a 15-year-old girl who was
one of the two suspended students, told CNN that “I’d like to say this is some
good and necessary trouble…My biggest concern is not only about me being safe,
it’s about everyone being safe because behind every teacher, student and staff
member, there is a family, there are friends, and I would just want to keep
everyone safe.”
There you have it: A teenage girl has to
point out that the schools should be actively trying to protect students (and
through them their families and friends), not just making excuses for why they
can’t do that. But she’s the one that got suspended, not the Superintendent for
his lack of action to protect the health of his students. It doesn’t strike me
that this will end well.
The
numbers
These
numbers are updated every day, based on reported US Covid-19 deaths the day
before (taken from the Worldometers.info site, where I’ve been getting my
numbers all along). No other variables go into the projected numbers – they are
all projections based on yesterday’s 7-day rate of increase in total Covid-19
deaths, which was 5%.
Note
that the “accuracy” of the projected numbers diminishes greatly after 3-4
weeks. This is because, up until 3-4 weeks, deaths could in theory be predicted
very accurately, if one knew the real number of cases. In other words, the
people who are going to die in the next 3-4 weeks of Covid-19 are already sick
with the disease, even though they may not know it yet. But this means that the
trend in deaths should be some indicator of the level of infection 3-4 weeks
previous.
However,
once we get beyond 3-4 weeks, deaths become more and more dependent on policies
and practices that are put in place – or removed, as is more the case nowadays
- after today (as well as other factors like the widespread availability of an
effective treatment, if not a real “cure”). Yet I still think there’s value in
just trending out the current rate of increase in deaths, since it gives some
indication of what will happen in the near term if there are no significant
intervening changes.
Week ending
|
Deaths reported during week/month
|
Avg. deaths per day during
week/month
|
Deaths as percentage of previous month’s
|
March 7
|
18
|
3
|
|
March 14
|
38
|
5
|
|
March 21
|
244
|
35
|
|
March 28
|
1,928
|
275
|
|
Month of March
|
4,058
|
131
|
|
April 4
|
6,225
|
889
|
|
April 11
|
12,126
|
1,732
|
|
April 18
|
18,434
|
2,633
|
|
April 25
|
15,251
|
2,179
|
|
Month of April
|
59,812
|
1,994
|
1,474%
|
May 2
|
13,183
|
1,883
|
|
May 9
|
12,592
|
1,799
|
|
May 16
|
10,073
|
1,439
|
|
May 23
|
8,570
|
1,224
|
|
May 30
|
6,874
|
982
|
|
Month of May
|
42,327
|
1,365
|
71%
|
June 6
|
6,544
|
935
|
|
June 13
|
5,427
|
775
|
|
June 20
|
4,457
|
637
|
|
June 27
|
6,167
|
881
|
|
Month of June
|
23,925
|
798
|
57%
|
July 4
|
4,166
|
595
|
|
July 11
|
5,087
|
727
|
|
July 18
|
5,476
|
782
|
|
July 25
|
6,971
|
996
|
|
Month of July
|
26,649
|
860
|
111%
|
August 1
|
8,069
|
1,153
|
|
August 8
|
7,657
|
1,094
|
|
August 15
|
8,028
|
1,147
|
|
August 22
|
8,417
|
1,202
|
|
August 29
|
8,825
|
1,261
|
|
Month of August
|
35,342
|
1,140
|
133%
|
Total March – August
|
192,113
|
|
|
Red = projected numbers
I. Total
deaths
Total US deaths as of yesterday: 162,836
Deaths reported yesterday: 1,228
Yesterday’s 7-day rate of increase in total deaths: 5% (This number
is used to project deaths in the table above; it was 5% two days ago. There is
a 7-day cycle in the reported deaths numbers, caused by lack of reporting over
the weekends from closed state offices. So this is the only reliable indicator
of a trend in deaths, not the three-day percent increase I used to focus on,
and certainly not the one-day percent increase, which mainly reflects where we
are in the 7-day cycle).
II. Total
reported cases
Total US reported cases: 5,033,723
Increase in reported cases since previous day: 59,982
Percent increase in reported cases since 7 days previous: 9%
III. Deaths as a percentage of closed cases so far
in the US:
Total Recoveries in US as of yesterday: 2,577,914
Total Deaths as of yesterday: 162,836
Deaths so far as percentage of closed cases (=deaths + recoveries): 6%
For a
discussion of what this number means – and why it’s so important – see this post. Short
answer: If this percentage declines, that’s good. It’s been steadily declining since
a high of 41% at the end of March. But a good number would be 2%, like South
Korea’s. An OK number would be 4%, like China’s.
I would love to hear any comments or
questions you have on this post. Drop me an email at tom@tomalrich.com
Comments
Post a Comment