You got to give Trump credit - he's consistent!
Three
of the national numbers I track are slowly moving the right way. For example, the
test positive rate keeps trending down. It’s at 5.9% now, vs. 8.5% at its July
peak and 21.9% at its April peak. But we’re still averaging over 1,000 deaths a
day, as you can see below.
But
the one number that isn’t trending down now is probably the most important one –
the number of daily new cases. It’s down from its peak of about 60,000 on
August 14, and it hit a low of about 33,000 on August 23. Since then, it’s been
going back up, and it was at 49,000 yesterday.
There’s
a long way to go before the Trump administration’s statements that we’ve
actually beaten the novel coronavirus will prove true – and there’s still the
likelihood that there will be another big wave of infections and deaths in the
fall, and that school reopenings will seed a lot of local outbreaks, as
happened in Israel. Also, no country ever “beats” the virus. Vietnam and New
Zealand have shown that months of zero new cases don’t show the virus has
disappeared. But most countries in the developed world at least have it under
control, unlike the US.
Hopefully
the newly-announced deal with Abbott Labs for 150 million new tests – which don’t
require any lab analysis at all and can be read in 15 minutes, although they
have to be administered by a health professional – might finally give the US
the testing capacity it needs to control the virus. It’s bizarre that the
administration made such a big deal over the FDA’s emergency use authorization
for blood plasma treatment – when there’s little to no evidence that it will improve
things at all – yet hasn’t shouted from the rooftops about the new Abbott deal.
But
there are two reasons why it hasn’t:
1. Trump wanted something to announce on
the first day of the GOP convention. The plasma was all he had then.
2. By touting the testing deal, he would
be showing that his previous statements that we’re doing more testing than we
need – rather than needing much more capacity than we have, as is actually the
case – were false.
But
he’s not just concerned about being seen as a liar – if he were worried about
that, he wouldn’t say anything at all, since just about every other sentence he
says is a lie. Rather, he’s worried that making a big deal of the testing
agreement will simply call attention to the fact that we need some sort of
breakthrough like that (as well as others, like universal mask wearing in most
states) in order to get the virus under control – and we would have had it
under control months ago if we’d had even a fraction of the 150 million tests
available then.
As
John Bolton said, every important decision made in this White House is driven
by what Trump perceives to be the best course to ensure his re-election. And he
decided from the beginning that actually beating the virus wasn’t the way to
win the election. He’s been sure all along that simply creating the illusion
that the virus will either go away soon, or that it’s already beaten, will get
him re-elected. And he’s been quite consistent about not wanting to take any
steps – no matter how important – that could help us beat the virus, if they
don’t at the same time contribute to this illusion.
Of
course, he’s going to lose both the election and the fight against the virus. But
not to worry – he’s been able to turn the presidency into a big profit
generator for his businesses, and that was his number one goal all along. It’s
just too bad he can’t continue to do that for another four years.
The numbers
These numbers are updated
every day, based on reported US Covid-19 deaths the day before (taken from the
Worldometers.info site, where I’ve been getting my numbers all along). No other
variables go into the projected numbers – they are all projections based on
yesterday’s 7-day rate of increase in total Covid-19 deaths, which was 4%.
Note that the “accuracy”
of the projected numbers diminishes greatly after 3-4 weeks. This is because,
up until 3-4 weeks, deaths could in theory be predicted very accurately, if one
knew the real number of cases. In other words, the people who are going to die
in the next 3-4 weeks of Covid-19 are already sick with the disease, even
though they may not know it yet. But this means that the trend in deaths should
be some indicator of the level of infection 3-4 weeks previous.
However, once we get
beyond 3-4 weeks, deaths become more and more dependent on policies and
practices that are put in place – or removed, as is more the case nowadays -
after today (as well as other factors like the widespread availability of an
effective treatment, if not a real “cure”). Yet I still think there’s value in
just trending out the current rate of increase in deaths, since it gives some
indication of what will happen in the near term if there are no significant
intervening changes.
Week
ending
|
Deaths
reported during week/month
|
Avg.
deaths per day during week/month
|
Deaths as
percentage of previous month’s
|
March 7
|
18
|
3
|
|
March 14
|
38
|
5
|
|
March 21
|
244
|
35
|
|
March 28
|
1,928
|
275
|
|
Month of
March
|
4,058
|
131
|
|
April 4
|
6,225
|
889
|
|
April 11
|
12,126
|
1,732
|
|
April 18
|
18,434
|
2,633
|
|
April 25
|
15,251
|
2,179
|
|
Month of
April
|
59,812
|
1,994
|
1,474%
|
May 2
|
13,183
|
1,883
|
|
May 9
|
12,592
|
1,799
|
|
May 16
|
10,073
|
1,439
|
|
May 23
|
8,570
|
1,224
|
|
May 30
|
6,874
|
982
|
|
Month of
May
|
42,327
|
1,365
|
71%
|
June 6
|
6,544
|
935
|
|
June 13
|
5,427
|
775
|
|
June 20
|
4,457
|
637
|
|
June 27
|
6,167
|
881
|
|
Month of
June
|
23,925
|
798
|
57%
|
July 4
|
4,166
|
595
|
|
July 11
|
5,087
|
727
|
|
July 18
|
5,476
|
782
|
|
July 25
|
6,971
|
996
|
|
Month of July
|
26,649
|
860
|
111%
|
August 1
|
8,069
|
1,153
|
|
August 8
|
7,153
|
1,022
|
|
August 15
|
7,556
|
1,079
|
|
August 22
|
7,552
|
1,079
|
|
August 29
|
6,800
|
971
|
|
Month of August
|
31,243
|
1,008
|
117%
|
September
5
|
7,057
|
1,008
|
|
September
12
|
7,323
|
1,046
|
|
September
19
|
7,600
|
1,086
|
|
September
26
|
7,886
|
1,127
|
|
Month
of Sept.
|
31,749
|
1,058
|
102%
|
Total
March – September
|
219,763
|
|
|
Red = projected
numbers
I. Total deaths
Total US deaths as of
yesterday: 185,985
Deaths reported yesterday:
1,151
Yesterday’s 7-day rate of
increase in total deaths: 4% (This number is used to project deaths in the
table above; it was 4% two days ago. There is a 7-day cycle in the reported deaths
numbers, caused by lack of reporting over the weekends from closed state
offices. So this is the only reliable indicator of a trend in deaths, not the three-day
percent increase I used to focus on, and certainly not the one-day percent
increase, which mainly reflects where we are in the 7-day cycle).
II. Total reported cases
Total US reported cases: 6,097,426
Increase in reported cases
since previous day: 49,022
Percent increase in reported
cases since 7 days previous: 5%
III. Deaths as a percentage of closed cases so far in the US:
Total Recoveries in US as
of yesterday: 3,376,557
Total Deaths as of yesterday:
185,985
Deaths so far as
percentage of closed cases (=deaths + recoveries): 5%
For a discussion of what this number means – and why
it’s so important – see this post. Short
answer: If this percentage declines, that’s good. It’s been steadily declining since
a high of 41% at the end of March. But a good number would be 2%, like South
Korea’s. An OK number would be 4%, like China’s.
IV. 7-day average of
test positive rate for US: 5.9%
For
comparison, the recent peak for this rate was 27% in late July, although the peak
in late March was 75%. This is published by Johns Hopkins (recent rates for New
York state: .8%. For Texas: 15.8%. For Florida: 14.5%. For Arizona: 8.6%).
I
would love to hear any comments or questions you have on this post. Drop me an
email at tom@tomalrich.com
Comments
Post a Comment