"It has come to this..."
Today’s
Times carried a great op-ed
by the former director of the National Institutes of Health (where Dr. Fauci
works today, of course) and the president of the Rockefeller Foundation
entitled “It Has Come to This: Ignore the C.D.C.”
The
title refers to the CDC’s puzzling (and that’s the best you can say for it)
assertion last week that asymptomatic people should not be tested for Covid-19.
For the moment, let’s put aside the fact that the stated reason for this change
in policy is that tests need to be reserved for people who are very likely to already
be sick, since they have symptoms. Hmm…I guess this means we’re not now testing
enough at all, as of course Trump and others in the administration have said
repeatedly (My goodness, does this mean they’re misrepresenting facts? Who
would have thought this to be possible?).
In
fact, Trump has repeatedly said we’re doing too much testing, by which he means
we’re doing so much testing that it might cost him re-election. At his Tulsa
rally, he said he had ordered testing to be throttled back. Of course, various
people in the administration and Congress quickly asserted that he didn’t mean
this. Yet here we have the CDC saying exactly that.
As
the authors of the op-ed point out, the CDC isn’t a regulatory agency, so this statement
can be ignored, and already is being ignored in many areas. And of course there’s
lots of precedent for this attitude, since Trump and his administration – like the
noble Dr. Deborah Birx, who thankfully isn’t heard from in the press very much
nowadays – have repeatedly forced the CDC to tone down its warnings about fairly
inconsequential matters like whether children will be safe going back into full
classrooms in areas where the novel coronavirus is still spreading (another
note: in the last month or two, new infections and deaths among children
have increased
more quickly than among adults. Of course, I’m sure Trump and Betsy DeVos,
having seen this statistic, will immediately cease their efforts to get school
districts to reopen before it’s safe. As Trump has said, fighting the virus is
his first priority, although it seems inciting political violence is now right
up there with it).
The
two authors lay out exactly why it’s important to be testing asymptomatic people,
especially in certain situations (e.g. they were in close contact with an
infected person, or they’re going back to work in almost any workplace). But
they also point out that – pending a widely-available and effective vaccine – there
is no such thing as too much testing. In fact, they admit that, were it at all
possible (which it’s not), testing every American every day would be the best
course.
It’s
safe to say that this CDC directive will be ignored (and of course, Dr. Redfield,
who made his name in the military by underplaying the importance of responding to
the AIDS epidemic and now seems to be carrying out that old playbook on a much
wider stage, is already trying to walk it back some). But it’s of course really
sad that the CDC - which was recognized around the world as the gold standard
for public health agencies (as indicated by the number of countries, like China,
that have named their agencies the
CDC) – is now just another administration voice that we should tune out.
The numbers
These numbers are updated
every day, based on reported US Covid-19 deaths the day before (taken from the
Worldometers.info site, where I’ve been getting my numbers all along). No other
variables go into the projected numbers – they are all projections based on
yesterday’s 7-day rate of increase in total Covid-19 deaths, which was 4%.
Note that the “accuracy”
of the projected numbers diminishes greatly after 3-4 weeks. This is because,
up until 3-4 weeks, deaths could in theory be predicted very accurately, if one
knew the real number of cases. In other words, the people who are going to die
in the next 3-4 weeks of Covid-19 are already sick with the disease, even
though they may not know it yet. But this means that the trend in deaths should
be some indicator of the level of infection 3-4 weeks previous.
However, once we get
beyond 3-4 weeks, deaths become more and more dependent on policies and
practices that are put in place – or removed, as is more the case nowadays -
after today (as well as other factors like the widespread availability of an
effective treatment, if not a real “cure”). Yet I still think there’s value in
just trending out the current rate of increase in deaths, since it gives some
indication of what will happen in the near term if there are no significant
intervening changes.
Week
ending
|
Deaths
reported during week/month
|
Avg.
deaths per day during week/month
|
Deaths as
percentage of previous month’s
|
March 7
|
18
|
3
|
|
March 14
|
38
|
5
|
|
March 21
|
244
|
35
|
|
March 28
|
1,928
|
275
|
|
Month of
March
|
4,058
|
131
|
|
April 4
|
6,225
|
889
|
|
April 11
|
12,126
|
1,732
|
|
April 18
|
18,434
|
2,633
|
|
April 25
|
15,251
|
2,179
|
|
Month of
April
|
59,812
|
1,994
|
1,474%
|
May 2
|
13,183
|
1,883
|
|
May 9
|
12,592
|
1,799
|
|
May 16
|
10,073
|
1,439
|
|
May 23
|
8,570
|
1,224
|
|
May 30
|
6,874
|
982
|
|
Month of
May
|
42,327
|
1,365
|
71%
|
June 6
|
6,544
|
935
|
|
June 13
|
5,427
|
775
|
|
June 20
|
4,457
|
637
|
|
June 27
|
6,167
|
881
|
|
Month of
June
|
23,925
|
798
|
57%
|
July 4
|
4,166
|
595
|
|
July 11
|
5,087
|
727
|
|
July 18
|
5,476
|
782
|
|
July 25
|
6,971
|
996
|
|
Month of July
|
26,649
|
860
|
111%
|
August 1
|
8,069
|
1,153
|
|
August 8
|
7,153
|
1,022
|
|
August 15
|
7,556
|
1,079
|
|
August 22
|
7,552
|
1,079
|
|
August 29
|
6,675
|
954
|
|
Month of August
|
30,970
|
999
|
116%
|
September
5
|
6,771
|
967
|
|
September
12
|
7,016
|
1,002
|
|
September
19
|
7,270
|
1,039
|
|
September
26
|
7,534
|
1,076
|
|
Month
of Sept.
|
30,425
|
1,014
|
98%
|
Total
March – September
|
218,166
|
|
|
Red = projected
numbers
I. Total deaths
Total US deaths as of
yesterday: 187,742
Deaths reported yesterday:
515
Percent increase in total
deaths in the last seven days: 4% (This number is used to project deaths in
the table above; it was 4% two days ago. There is a 7-day cycle in the reported
deaths numbers, caused by lack of reporting over the weekends from closed state
offices. So this is the only reliable indicator of a trend in deaths, not the three-day
percent increase I used to focus on, and certainly not the one-day percent
increase, which mainly reflects where we are in the 7-day cycle).
II. Total reported cases
Total US reported cases: 6,212,174
Increase in reported cases
since previous day: 37,166
Percent increase in reported
cases in the last seven days: 5%
III. Deaths as a percentage of closed cases so far in the US:
Total Recoveries in US as
of yesterday: 3,456,859
Total Deaths as of yesterday:
187,742
Deaths so far as
percentage of closed cases (=deaths + recoveries): 5%
For a discussion of what this number means – and why
it’s so important – see this post. Short
answer: If this percentage declines, that’s good. It’s been steadily declining since
a high of 41% at the end of March. But a good number would be 2%, like South
Korea’s. An OK number would be 4%, like China’s.
IV. 7-day average of
test positive rate for US: 5.7%
For
comparison, the recent peak for this rate was 27% in late July, although the peak
in late March was 75%. This is published by Johns Hopkins (recent rates for New
York state: .8%. For Texas: 11.2%. For Florida: 12.3%. For Arizona: 7.2%).
I
would love to hear any comments or questions you have on this post. Drop me an
email at tom@tomalrich.com
Comments
Post a Comment