The war on children, federal edition

The Times ran a disturbing article today about the White House pressure campaign on the CDC this summer to modify the guidance they were putting out about reopening schools. They were trying to get the CDC to play down the risks and accentuate the benefits of reopening. Of course, this isn’t exactly a secret, since it was fairly clear they were doing that this summer – but it’s still amazing to see this confirmed in black and white.

What I find most amazing though, is the fact that Dr. Deborah Birx took an active role in this process. She asked Dr. Redfield to include in the introduction to the guidance a quote from a little-known agency within DHS to the effect that “very few reports of children being the primary source of Covid-19 transmission among family members have emerged”. It also asserted that children who were asymptomatic “are unlikely to spread the virus.”

The former statement was misleading, given that the science still isn’t definitive on that topic either way. And the latter is a misrepresentation of the science (someone less charitable might call it a “lie”), since younger children have been shown to be at least as likely to spread the virus if asymptomatic, and perhaps more likely. There is little data on this, since children are seldom tested if they’re asymptomatic, but if you don’t have much data, you should always err on the side of caution, not airily state “Don’t worry about the kids. They’ll be fine. Why, Dr. Trump himself says so!”

Dr. Birx was only partially successful in her effort to get the CDC to change their guidance. And of course Trump never had the power to push schools to reopen, since those decisions are controlled on the state and local level (I’ll discuss how badly that can go in another post soon). But I do believe Dr. Birx deserves a medal for valor in the federal War on Children.

She has been a disaster in the White House. The Times made it clear in a great article a couple months ago that, despite having no epidemiological background, she became convinced in April that the virus would disappear very soon. Soon, she was meeting daily with the Chief of Staff and provided the “science” that guided the Trump administration’s disastrous push to get states to reopen before they should have. I thought the best that could be said for her lately was that she had pretty much shut up for the last few months, but now it turns out she was actively working behind the scenes to make sure that the burden of the failed US response to the novel coronavirus was shared as equally as possible between children and adults. After all, kids have the right to endanger their and their families’ health, too - just like adults. 

I would love to hear any comments or questions you have on this post. Drop me an email at tom@tomalrich.com

 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

How naïve I was…

On March 18, 2020, I put up my fifth post in this blog (this is my 356 th post, for those keeping score at home). I had written my first pandemic post (although I wrote it on my cybersecurity blog ) on Saturday, March 14. This was right after I’d read a really disturbing article that shattered my assumption that the unfortunate incident in Wuhan two months previous could never happen here. I recently reread the March 18 post because a significant number of people have been reading it in the last couple of months, even though I haven’t referred to it at all. Of course, I can’t ask those people why they’re reading it, but what struck me when I reread it was my (in retrospect, of course) incredible naivete when I wrote it. It’s instructive to read some of my statements, a little more than three years later: Since there have already been thousands of deaths worldwide (but not yet tens of thousands, hundreds of thousands, or millions), the battle is to keep that number as low as pos...
Read more

It’s all about health care

Over the weekend, there were two momentous events in Washington that will undoubtedly have a seriously negative effect on the health (or lack thereof) of the American people. However, just one of these events on its surface seems to be about healthcare. In this post, I will discuss the one that doesn’t seem to be about healthcare, but actually is. Barring some unforeseen development before then, in my next post I’ll discuss the other event. The former event was the death of Ruth Bader Ginsburg on Friday and Mitch McConnell’s immediate (i.e. about 1 ½ hours after her passing was announced) announcement that he would push through Trump’s nominee before the election – assuming four Republican Senators don’t block that process. Why is this event about healthcare? Because the Supreme Court is set to decide in December a case that would literally overturn Obamacare and cause more than 20 million people to lose healthcare coverage in the middle of a pandemic.   The case is based on a ...
Read more

The tragedy in India

For a great account of what’s going on in India, read this WaPo article. And read this Atlantic article for a good commentary on how India’s wealthier class ignored the lessons of the 1984 Bhopal disaster and let the health care system stagnate, leaving the country unable to handle this sudden surge in the virus. Although it's wrong to say the system stagnated. For the wealthy, it became (and remains) world-class. Does this remind you of another health care system that, at least in the early days of the pandemic, was overwhelmed?  Both articles call attention to the Modi government’s failures, but they both try to spread the blame around. Yes, others are responsible, but the fact that – after a terrible response to the first wave of the virus – the government got lulled into thinking they’d beaten it, so they could open up completely (including holding big political rallies and allowing the annual Kumbh Mela to take place – this year in Haridwar, which I’ve visited and can ...
Read more