You might want to put your 2021 Mardi Gras party on hold

  

The Times ran an opinion piece today entitled “Stop Expecting Life to Go Back to Normal Next Year”. The author’s main reason for saying this is that, even though it’s likely there will likely be an “effective” and reasonably safe vaccine this year, it’s highly unlikely that it will produce the desired herd immunity anytime soon, for a host of reasons laid out in the op-ed. The piece points out that it will be impossible for people to safely relax the precautions they’re now taking (or should be taking) - including no large indoor gatherings, wearing a mask, avoiding travel, etc. – until at least the last half of 2021.

This is of course sobering, although I wasn’t even planning on being able to return to anything like “normal” until next summer at the earliest. What I found most impressive in the article were these two paragraphs:

We wasted our chance to get a better summer in the spring. We wasted our chance to plan for the fall in the summer. We’re wasting time again now. Next year isn’t that far away.

We still need to figure out how to live in this new world, now, and that means embracing, finally, all the strategies for fighting the virus that many of us have resisted.

In other words, in the late spring the US really blew it by opening up too quickly, and even more by assuming that life could immediately get back to normal – so there was little preparation in some states for anything less than full reopening. Thus, the opportunity to make some progress in the summer was largely lost. This summer, we repeated that mistake by not planning for the fall, especially planning for schools to reopen safely – meaning partially, and with a lot of expensive measures in place to keep kids and faculty safe. The result is there will almost definitely be fewer kids in school this fall than if the administration had taken a realistic view, instead of assuming the virus would magically disappear by the summer.

Now we’ve clearly lost the opportunity to make progress in the fall (I’m saying this because my projected deaths numbers for September just jumped by about 3,000 today. I’m going to wait ‘til tomorrow to push the panic button, but this is the first big reversal since late June, when they started trending down); the only real question is whether we’ll have a huge upturn in deaths due to the flu season coinciding with the pandemic.

So if we want to make life a little better next year, we need to do the things that we should have been doing all along: greatly expanding testing availability, implementing the contact tracing that is almost nonexistent in some states, making sure that schools don’t reopen in areas that don’t meet CDC guidelines for doing so, and shutting down interstate (and in some cases intrastate) travel as much as possible. And if these don’t work and we get a big resurgence this fall, then we have to look at more lockdowns again.

Of course, the Trump administration isn’t going to do any of these things – in fact, they’ll continue to deny there’s even a problem. This means that we won’t even start planning for next year until after January 20. And that means we won’t really be coming out of the pandemic until next summer at the earliest, vaccine or no vaccine.


The numbers

These numbers are updated every day, based on reported US Covid-19 deaths the day before (taken from the Worldometers.info site, where I’ve been getting my numbers all along). No other variables go into the projected numbers – they are all projections based on yesterday’s 7-day rate of increase in total Covid-19 deaths, which was 3.2%.

Note that the “accuracy” of the projected numbers diminishes greatly after 3-4 weeks. This is because, up until 3-4 weeks, deaths could in theory be predicted very accurately, if one knew the real number of cases. In other words, the people who are going to die in the next 3-4 weeks of Covid-19 are already sick with the disease, even though they may not know it yet. But this means that the trend in deaths should be some indicator of the level of infection 3-4 weeks previous.

However, once we get beyond 3-4 weeks, deaths become more and more dependent on policies and practices that are put in place – or removed, as is more the case nowadays - after today (as well as other factors like the widespread availability of an effective treatment, if not a real “cure”). Yet I still think there’s value in just trending out the current rate of increase in deaths, since it gives some indication of what will happen in the near term if there are no significant intervening changes.

Week ending

Deaths reported during week/month

Avg. deaths per day during week/month

Deaths as percentage of previous month’s

March 7

18

3

 

March 14

38

5

 

March 21

244

35

 

March 28

1,928

275

 

Month of March

4,058

131

 

April 4

6,225

889

 

April 11

12,126

1,732

 

April 18

18,434

2,633

 

April 25

15,251

2,179

 

Month of April

59,812

1,994

1,474%

May 2

13,183

1,883

 

May 9

12,592

1,799

 

May 16

10,073

1,439

 

May 23

8,570

1,224

 

May 30

6,874

982

 

Month of May

42,327

1,365

71%

June 6

6,544

935

 

June 13

5,427

775

 

June 20

4,457

637

 

June 27

6,167

881

 

Month of June

23,925

798

57%

July 4

4,166

 595

 

July 11

5,087

727

 

July 18

 5,476

782

 

July 25

 6,971

996

 

Month of July

26,649

860

111%

August 1

8,069

1,153

 

August 8

7,153

1,022

 

August 15

7,556

1,079

 

August 22

7,552

1,079

 

August 29

6,675

954

 

Month of August

30,970

999

116%

September 5

5,961

852

 

September 12

5,310

759

 

September 19

6,290

899

 

September 26

6,490

927

 

Month of Sept.

25,506

850

82%

Total March – September

213,247

 

 

Red = projected numbers

I. Total deaths

Total US deaths as of yesterday: 200,197

Deaths reported yesterday: 1,170

Percent increase in total deaths in the last seven days: 3.2% (This number is used to project deaths in the table above. There is a 7-day cycle in the reported deaths numbers, caused by lack of reporting over the weekends from closed state offices. So this is the only reliable indicator of a trend in deaths, not the three-day percent increase I used to focus on, and certainly not the one-day percent increase, which mainly reflects where we are in the 7-day cycle).

II. Total reported cases

Total US reported cases: 6,788,471

Increase in reported cases since previous day: 38,463

Percent increase in reported cases in the last seven days: 4%  

 III. Deaths as a percentage of closed cases so far in the US:

Total Recoveries in US as of yesterday: 4,068,704

Total Deaths as of yesterday: 200,197

Deaths so far as percentage of closed cases (=deaths + recoveries): 5%

For a discussion of what this number means – and why it’s so important – see this post. Short answer: If this percentage declines, that’s good. It’s been steadily declining since a high of 41% at the end of March. But a good number would be 2%, like South Korea’s. An OK number would be 4%, like China’s.

 IV. 7-day average of test positive rate for US: 5.3%

For comparison, the recent peak for this rate was 27% in late July, although the peak in late March was 75%. This is published by Johns Hopkins. As of 9/15, rate for New York state: .9%. For Texas: 7.9%. For Florida: 12.3%.  For Arizona: 6.9. For California: 3.3%).

 

I would love to hear any comments or questions you have on this post. Drop me an email at tom@tomalrich.com

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The tragedy in India

The Indian variant

More than ever, we’re on our own