He saw it coming
The Atlantic’s daily newsletter had a great embedded article yesterday. I’m reproducing it in full (the newsletter is free to everybody anyway, although you do need to subscribe to see articles beyond a certain number. I highly recommend you subscribe, since they’ve provided some of the best coverage of the election and especially the pandemic). I’m sure you’ll agree this is quite remarkable. BTW, Ron Klain is the incoming White House Chief of Staff.
It
is a truism in journalism
that predicting the future is perilous, mainly because it hasn’t happened
yet. So when we publish articles that, over time, prove their prescience,
attention ought to be paid. In late January, at a moment when most
of us could not imagine that 2020 would soon come to resemble 1918, The
Atlantic published an article by Ron Klain titled, “Coronavirus Is
Coming—And Trump Isn’t Ready.” Our Ideas editor, Yoni Appelbaum, had
asked Klain, then a private citizen and now President-elect Joe Biden’s chief
of staff, to help our readers understand the risks ahead. Klain, who served
as President Barack Obama’s Ebola coordinator, suggested keeping an eye on
one question in particular: Whether President Trump could bring himself to
listen to Anthony Fauci. That, Klain said, would be key. In the article that resulted from this
conversation, Klain wrote, “Five presidents—liberals and conservatives,
Democrats and Republicans—have looked to Tony Fauci for advice; it is not
impossible to imagine Trump being the first to angrily dismiss the counsel he
offers if it does not fit with his own poor instincts.” I called Klain the
other day to ask him how he knew, to such a granular degree, that the
Trump-Fauci relationship would go sideways. “We
knew already that Trump has a style of governing that rejects facts and that
demands that people see the world his way, that they live in his
counterfactual reality,” he said. “He also has a tendency to downplay
threats, whatever kind of threats they are. I knew Dr. Fauci well enough to
know that he was going to tell the truth and speak out and that sooner or
later that would run afoul of the Trump approach to governance.” Klain was in a
unique position to make predictions about COVID-19. As
the coordinator of Obama’s successful fight against Ebola, he had developed
important knowledge about infectious disease. But he also gained an
understanding of Trump’s destructive impact on public health. |
“One
thing people forget is that after ‘birtherism’ blew up on Trump, he faded
from view for a little while and only emerged back into our politics around Ebola,” Klain said. “He
was the leading public voice attacking Obama’s Ebola response. His
tweets—there are studies that show this—were a main cause of the fear that
galvanized around Ebola. He tweeted that the efforts to fight Ebola in West
Africa were a mistake, that bringing home the doctor who had contracted Ebola
in West Africa was a mistake—he said he should be left to die. Trump was
completely unhinged from science, and this had a significant impact on the
public psyche. It gave me an early indication of how he would handle a
pandemic.” What did Klain
learn by watching Trump? Overpromising solutions in a
pandemic is dangerous, but so is under-promising: “One of the reasons we’re
in the mess we’re in is that President Trump believed, or simply said, that
this virus would be gone like a miracle. It would be gone by Easter; it will
be gone by Memorial Day.” Biden, Klain said, will take a more
nuanced approach. “President-elect Biden is very clear in saying that COVID
is not going to go away in 100 days, that life will not go back to normal in
100 days. But it’s important for a leader in this situation to offer a mix of
realism and hope. I don’t think you’re going to get people to participate in
a response if you tell them that the slog goes on forever, that there are no
midpoints, no progress. But you just can’t overpromise.” |
The numbers
These numbers are
updated every day, based on reported US Covid-19 deaths the day before (taken
from the Worldometers.info site, where I’ve been getting my numbers all along).
The projections are based on yesterday’s 7-day rate of increase in total
Covid-19 deaths, which was 6.1%.
Month |
Deaths reported during month |
Avg. deaths per day during
month |
Deaths as percentage of previous month’s |
Month of March |
4,058 |
131 |
|
Month of April |
59,812 |
1,994 |
1,474% |
Month of May |
42,327 |
1,365 |
71% |
Month of June |
23,925 |
798 |
57% |
Month of July |
26,649 |
860 |
111% |
Month
of August |
30,970 |
999 |
116% |
Month of Sept. |
22,809 |
760 |
75% |
Month of Oct. |
24,332 |
785 |
107% |
Month of Nov. |
38,293 |
1,276 |
157% |
Month of Dec. |
83,294 |
2,687 |
218% |
Total March-Dec. |
357,659 |
1,165 |
|
Red = projected
numbers
I. Total deaths
Total US deaths as of
yesterday: 314,629
Deaths yesterday: 3,538 (this is an all-time record, more than 400 more
than the record set all the way back on…Dec. 9)
Percent increase in total
deaths in the last seven days: 6.1% (This number is used to project deaths
in the table above. There is a 7-day cycle in the reported deaths numbers, caused
by lack of reporting over the weekends from closed state offices. So this is
the only reliable indicator of a trend in deaths, not the one-day percent
increase, which mainly reflects where we are in the 7-day cycle).
II. Total reported cases
Total US reported cases: 17,394,314
Increase in reported cases
since previous day: 248,686
Percent increase in reported
cases in the last seven days: 9.9%
III. Deaths as a percentage of closed cases so far in the US:
Total Recoveries in US as
of yesterday: 10,170,788
Total Deaths as of
yesterday: 314,629
Deaths so far as
percentage of closed cases (=deaths + recoveries): 3.0%
For a discussion of what this
number means – and why it’s so important – see this post. Short
answer: If this percentage declines, that’s good. It’s been steadily declining
since a high of 41% at the end of March.
IV. 7-day average of
test positive rate for US: 11.2%
For comparison, the previous peak for this rate was 7.8%
in late July, although the peak in early April was 22%. The rate got down to
4.0% in early October but has been climbing since then. This is published by
Johns Hopkins.
I would love to hear any comments or questions you have
on this post. Drop me an email at tom@tomalrich.com.
Comments
Post a Comment