The MMR vaccine looks better all the time


Julie McCullough, the friend who alerted me a few weeks ago to a study (that I wrote a post about) that seemed to show the widely-used MMR vaccine provides protection against Covid-19, sent another email to me this week. This time, it included a link to a much more conclusive study that indicates very strongly that the MMR vaccine confers immunity to Covid. She also linked a page that lists a number of other studies – and 25 news reports – that confirm this conclusion.

The nice thing about most of these studies is the authors didn’t have to go out and vaccinate thousands of people. All they had to do was compare data between different populations with different rates of MMR vaccination and compare rates of Covid deaths. The correlations are really striking. I must admit I didn’t get my MMR vaccine yet, but I will try tomorrow!  

The MMR vaccine is supposed to be given in two doses, but the second dose conveys at most an increase of 10% in effectiveness over the first. So I may not get the second, but I’ll at least get the first dose! Here’s Julie’s email:

Hi Tom,

In the face of all this bad news, it seems that the MMR news is traveling far and wide.

The World organization says the updated report has been read by 280,000 people and is the most read pre-print on ResearchGate.

There are now 8 peer reviews, and 5 new preprints (i.e. not peer reviewed yet), 2 Clinical Trials (Gates Foundation and one in Egypt) and a very long list of articles from all over the globe. 

Direct links to the articles, so in their native languages.  I scanned 3 or 4 in English.  Seems like most are reporting what the World.org report says, however it seems some are adding local information to it.

The article from Nigeria is in English. It reports on Madagascar as well, though I couldn’t tell if their info was from the study or if their information was from a more direct source.

I’m sharing this information with as many people as I can, and so far have 3 people who have asked their doctors, with a similar response, i.e.  “There’s nothing to lose. It’s worth doing”.

I thought you would find this continuing coverage interesting. 

Julie

I would love to hear any comments or questions you have on this post. Drop me an email at tom@tomalrich.com.

 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

How naïve I was…

On March 18, 2020, I put up my fifth post in this blog (this is my 356 th post, for those keeping score at home). I had written my first pandemic post (although I wrote it on my cybersecurity blog ) on Saturday, March 14. This was right after I’d read a really disturbing article that shattered my assumption that the unfortunate incident in Wuhan two months previous could never happen here. I recently reread the March 18 post because a significant number of people have been reading it in the last couple of months, even though I haven’t referred to it at all. Of course, I can’t ask those people why they’re reading it, but what struck me when I reread it was my (in retrospect, of course) incredible naivete when I wrote it. It’s instructive to read some of my statements, a little more than three years later: Since there have already been thousands of deaths worldwide (but not yet tens of thousands, hundreds of thousands, or millions), the battle is to keep that number as low as pos
Read more

It’s all about health care

Over the weekend, there were two momentous events in Washington that will undoubtedly have a seriously negative effect on the health (or lack thereof) of the American people. However, just one of these events on its surface seems to be about healthcare. In this post, I will discuss the one that doesn’t seem to be about healthcare, but actually is. Barring some unforeseen development before then, in my next post I’ll discuss the other event. The former event was the death of Ruth Bader Ginsburg on Friday and Mitch McConnell’s immediate (i.e. about 1 ½ hours after her passing was announced) announcement that he would push through Trump’s nominee before the election – assuming four Republican Senators don’t block that process. Why is this event about healthcare? Because the Supreme Court is set to decide in December a case that would literally overturn Obamacare and cause more than 20 million people to lose healthcare coverage in the middle of a pandemic.   The case is based on a ridi
Read more

An up-close look at a hospital breaking under the Omicron load

This opinion piece in WaPo today provides a horrifying perspective by an ER doctor on the situation in her ER on a “typical” day of the omicron wave. It shows very clearly that lack of beds is just the beginning of the problem. The lack of staff at all levels – EMTs through nurses through physicians – is really hurting, but even worse, it’s leading to more burnout among the existing staff, which of course is making the staffing shortage worse, which of course is increasing burnout…lather, rinse, repeat. I have two ideas for Joe Biden: First, turn Build Back Better into another Covid relief bill, this one focused entirely on building back the hospital staff (and infrastructure, although that’s not the main problem) that we need to handle what – as the author points out – will undoubtedly be an overload of the system for a long time to come. This is both because we’re almost certainly not finished with Covid, even when the omicron wave subsides, but because there is a big backlog
Read more