More news from Paulding County
The
Washington Post published a great Perspective
piece this morning by Amy Westmoreland of Lithia Springs, GA. She is – or was
– a school nurse in the Paulding County School District in Georgia, which I
wrote about in this
post on August 7. She loved her job and the fact that she could really help the
kids who came to her, both physically and emotionally. However, that came to an
end this summer:
…as the school
board in Paulding County finalized its reopening plan this summer, it seemed
obvious to me that our leadership still wasn’t taking the pandemic seriously.
When I read the instructions for faculty and staff in mid-July, I knew I
couldn’t carry them out and sleep well at night. They make no sense — and won’t
keep people safe. I quit.
Of course, I
was afraid of catching the coronavirus on the job. But my bigger fear was that
I’d unknowingly spread it to students and their families, or to my colleagues.
I refuse to be complicit in endangering the health or the life of a child. I
refuse to act as a prop, making people feel secure when, in reality, we’re
putting their health at risk. As a nurse, I developed trust with families, with
children. Going back to work, as if everything were fine, would betray that
trust.
She
goes on to describe how the school district’s guidelines don’t require
mask-wearing and don’t even include temperature checks at the door (although
she points out that parents might give their child a fever-reducer and send
them anyway, if they think it’s just a routine cold or the flu. The guidelines
don’t seem to say anything about testing for the virus). She also describes the
protocols set up for how she is supposed to handle any child suspected by their
teacher of having Covid-19, and how following it would inevitably lead to her
infecting other children (and probably herself, although that isn’t her main
concern) if the suspicion proves correct. She simply couldn’t continue to work
at her school under those conditions.
Meanwhile,
how are things going at North Paulding High School, where two students were
suspended for posting photos of maskless students crowding hallways? The school
was shut down this week, at first because 7 or 8 infections were found in
students and staff members; the number of infections had climbed to 35 on
Thursday.
The
school will reopen next week on a system where students are in school two days
a week and virtual the other days. Masks will still be optional, and the school
won’t guarantee social distancing in classrooms or on buses. Meanwhile, cases continue
to climb in the county. It sounds like the administrators may have gotten the
message about how serious the situation is, but there are still parents that
are clamoring to have their kids in school, so they can work.
Of course, a little creativity – like outdoor classes – might have allowed the school to have the kids back as well as social distance. But I guess creativity is too much to ask for in that school, where less than two weeks ago they were suspending students for telling the truth to the nation. Since they're at least not doing that any more, I guess that counts as progress.
Of course, a little creativity – like outdoor classes – might have allowed the school to have the kids back as well as social distance. But I guess creativity is too much to ask for in that school, where less than two weeks ago they were suspending students for telling the truth to the nation. Since they're at least not doing that any more, I guess that counts as progress.
The numbers
These numbers are updated
every day, based on reported US Covid-19 deaths the day before (taken from the
Worldometers.info site, where I’ve been getting my numbers all along). No other
variables go into the projected numbers – they are all projections based on
yesterday’s 7-day rate of increase in total Covid-19 deaths, which was 5%.
Note that the “accuracy”
of the projected numbers diminishes greatly after 3-4 weeks. This is because,
up until 3-4 weeks, deaths could in theory be predicted very accurately, if one
knew the real number of cases. In other words, the people who are going to die
in the next 3-4 weeks of Covid-19 are already sick with the disease, even
though they may not know it yet. But this means that the trend in deaths should
be some indicator of the level of infection 3-4 weeks previous.
However, once we get
beyond 3-4 weeks, deaths become more and more dependent on policies and
practices that are put in place – or removed, as is more the case nowadays -
after today (as well as other factors like the widespread availability of an
effective treatment, if not a real “cure”). Yet I still think there’s value in
just trending out the current rate of increase in deaths, since it gives some
indication of what will happen in the near term if there are no significant
intervening changes.
Week
ending
|
Deaths
reported during week/month
|
Avg.
deaths per day during week/month
|
Deaths as
percentage of previous month’s
|
March 7
|
18
|
3
|
|
March 14
|
38
|
5
|
|
March 21
|
244
|
35
|
|
March 28
|
1,928
|
275
|
|
Month of
March
|
4,058
|
131
|
|
April 4
|
6,225
|
889
|
|
April 11
|
12,126
|
1,732
|
|
April 18
|
18,434
|
2,633
|
|
April 25
|
15,251
|
2,179
|
|
Month of
April
|
59,812
|
1,994
|
1,474%
|
May 2
|
13,183
|
1,883
|
|
May 9
|
12,592
|
1,799
|
|
May 16
|
10,073
|
1,439
|
|
May 23
|
8,570
|
1,224
|
|
May 30
|
6,874
|
982
|
|
Month of
May
|
42,327
|
1,365
|
71%
|
June 6
|
6,544
|
935
|
|
June 13
|
5,427
|
775
|
|
June 20
|
4,457
|
637
|
|
June 27
|
6,167
|
881
|
|
Month of
June
|
23,925
|
798
|
57%
|
July 4
|
4,166
|
595
|
|
July 11
|
5,087
|
727
|
|
July 18
|
5,476
|
782
|
|
July 25
|
6,971
|
996
|
|
Month of July
|
26,649
|
860
|
111%
|
August 1
|
8,069
|
1,153
|
|
August 8
|
7,153
|
1,022
|
|
August 15
|
7,556
|
1,079
|
|
August
22
|
7,902
|
1,129
|
|
August
29
|
8,264
|
1,181
|
|
Month
of August
|
33,312
|
1,075
|
125%
|
Total
March – August
|
190,083
|
Red = projected
numbers
I. Total deaths
Total US deaths as of
yesterday: 172,630
Deaths reported yesterday:
1,095
Yesterday’s 7-day rate of
increase in total deaths: 5% (This number is used to project deaths in the
table above; it was 5% two days ago. There is a 7-day cycle in the reported deaths
numbers, caused by lack of reporting over the weekends from closed state
offices. So this is the only reliable indicator of a trend in deaths, not the three-day
percent increase I used to focus on, and certainly not the one-day percent
increase, which mainly reflects where we are in the 7-day cycle).
II. Total reported cases
Total US reported cases: 5,531,282
Increase in reported cases
since previous day: 55,016
Percent increase in reported
cases since 7 days previous: 7%
III. Deaths as a percentage of closed cases so far in the US:
Total Recoveries in US as
of yesterday: 2,904,237
Total Deaths as of yesterday:
172,630
Deaths so far as
percentage of closed cases (=deaths + recoveries): 6%
For a discussion of what this number means – and why
it’s so important – see this post. Short
answer: If this percentage declines, that’s good. It’s been steadily declining since
a high of 41% at the end of March. But a good number would be 2%, like South
Korea’s. An OK number would be 4%, like China’s.
I
would love to hear any comments or questions you have on this post. Drop me an
email at tom@tomalrich.com
Comments
Post a Comment