Trump has great health care. His supporters? Not so much…


As I’m sure you know, President Trump returned from the hospital on Monday. Of course, no competent doctor would have allowed him to leave the hospital so quickly after having been given oxygen, as well as an experimental treatment so far reserved for Covid patients in serious danger. However, competence is not only not a precondition for being White House physician nowadays – it’s a complete disqualification.

Of course, Trump didn’t just paint his return as a triumph for him personally in beating Covid-19 (a highly dubious assertion to make at this point), but as a triumph for the American people. An important part of his message was that Americans have nothing to fear because we have the best healthcare system in the world – and he’s right, as long as you overlook the fact that we’re in the middle among developed countries in terms of life expectancy and close to the worst in terms of infant mortality. But we are the runaway champion in one area: the amount we spend on healthcare vs. the return we get from it in terms of patient outcomes. Nobody comes close to us in this metric, by a long shot!

One of the big problems is that health care is so unevenly available in the US, which is a big contributor to differences in life expectancies. One differentiator is wealth: Residents of the wealthy Streeterville neighborhood in Chicago have a life expectancy of 90 years, while those in the poor and overwhelmingly Black Englewood neighborhood (about ten miles away) can expect to live 60 years.

But another differentiator is urban vs. rural. Residents of large metropolitan areas can expect to live 79.1 years, while rural residents on average live 76.7 years. A story on NPR this morning pointed out that the biggest reason for this was the unavailability of quality health care to many rural residents due to:

1.      The fact that many of them don’t have health insurance. This is going to get much worse if the Supreme Court overturns Obamacare in December, which seems likely to happen. Some of the worst-impacted states from this will include West Virginia and Kentucky, where there are large numbers of Obamacare users.

2.      Closing of many rural hospitals in recent years, due in part to the lack of enough insured patients to pay the bills.

3.      Low availability of broadband internet access, which is becoming a crucial part of healthcare nowadays.

4.      Lack of free testing sites for Covid-19.

All of these problems have been aggravated under President Trump, and they will continue to be aggravated if he is re-elected. Yet – at least until very recently – he has had the overwhelming support of rural residents. You would think that Trump, after emerging from his gilded, 100% taxpayer-financed hospital stay, wouldn’t brag about the great healthcare he got, but might perhaps think about doing more to help his erstwhile fervent supporters who have anything but that.

Yes, you would certainly think that…

 

The numbers

These numbers are updated every day, based on reported US Covid-19 deaths the day before (taken from the Worldometers.info site, where I’ve been getting my numbers all along). No other variables go into the projected numbers – they are all projections based on yesterday’s 7-day rate of increase in total Covid-19 deaths, which was 2.4%.

Note that the “accuracy” of the projected numbers diminishes greatly after 3-4 weeks. This is because, up until 3-4 weeks, deaths could in theory be predicted very accurately, if one knew the real number of cases. In other words, the people who are going to die in the next 3-4 weeks of Covid-19 are already sick with the disease, even though they may not know it yet. But this means that the trend in deaths should be some indicator of the level of infection 3-4 weeks previous.

However, once we get beyond 3-4 weeks, deaths become more and more dependent on policies and practices that are put in place – or removed, as is more the case nowadays - after today (as well as other factors like the widespread availability of an effective treatment, if not a real “cure”). Yet I still think there’s value in just trending out the current rate of increase in deaths, since it gives some indication of what will happen in the near term if there are no significant intervening changes.

Week ending

Deaths reported during week/month

Avg. deaths per day during week/month

Deaths as percentage of previous month’s

March 7

18

3

 

March 14

38

5

 

March 21

244

35

 

March 28

1,928

275

 

Month of March

4,058

131

 

April 4

6,225

889

 

April 11

12,126

1,732

 

April 18

18,434

2,633

 

April 25

15,251

2,179

 

Month of April

59,812

1,994

1,474%

May 2

13,183

1,883

 

May 9

12,592

1,799

 

May 16

10,073

1,439

 

May 23

8,570

1,224

 

May 30

6,874

982

 

Month of May

42,327

1,365

71%

June 6

6,544

935

 

June 13

5,427

775

 

June 20

4,457

637

 

June 27

6,167

881

 

Month of June

23,925

798

57%

July 4

4,166

 595

 

July 11

5,087

727

 

July 18

 5,476

782

 

July 25

 6,971

996

 

Month of July

26,649

860

111%

August 1

8,069

1,153

 

August 8

7,153

1,022

 

August 15

7,556

1,079

 

August 22

7,552

1,079

 

August 29

6,675

954

 

Month of August

30,970

999

116%

September 5

5,961

852

 

September 12

5,310

759

 

September 19

5,696

814

 

September 26

5,353

765

 

Month of Sept.

22,809

760

75%

October 3

5,102

729

 

October 10

5,120

731

 

October 17

5,243

749

 

October 24

5,368

767

 

October 31

5,496

785

 

Month of Oct.

23,212

749

102%

 

233,762

 

 

Red = projected numbers

I. Total deaths

Total US deaths as of yesterday: 215,822

Deaths reported yesterday: 790  

Percent increase in total deaths in the last seven days: 2.4% (This number is used to project deaths in the table above. There is a 7-day cycle in the reported deaths numbers, caused by lack of reporting over the weekends from closed state offices. So this is the only reliable indicator of a trend in deaths, not the three-day percent increase I used to focus on, and certainly not the one-day percent increase, which mainly reflects where we are in the 7-day cycle).

II. Total reported cases

Total US reported cases: 7,722,746

Increase in reported cases since previous day: 43,660

Percent increase in reported cases in the last seven days: 4.7%  

III. Deaths as a percentage of closed cases so far in the US:

Total Recoveries in US as of yesterday: 4,936,501

Total Deaths as of yesterday: 215,822

Deaths so far as percentage of closed cases (=deaths + recoveries): 4.2%

For a discussion of what this number means – and why it’s so important – see this post. Short answer: If this percentage declines, that’s good. It’s been steadily declining since a high of 41% at the end of March. But a good number would be 2%, like South Korea’s. An OK number would be 4%, like China’s.

IV. 7-day average of test positive rate for US: 4.7%

For comparison, the recent peak for this rate was 27% in late July, although the peak in late March was 75%. This is published by Johns Hopkins. As of 10/2, rate for New York state: 1.2%. For Texas: 6.0%. For Florida: 10.9%.  For Arizona: 6.2%. For California: 2.8%).

I would love to hear any comments or questions you have on this post. Drop me an email at tom@tomalrich.com

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The tragedy in India

The Indian variant

More than ever, we’re on our own