Trump has great health care. His supporters? Not so much…
As I’m sure you know, President Trump returned from
the hospital on Monday. Of course, no competent doctor would have allowed him
to leave the hospital so quickly after having been given oxygen, as well as an
experimental treatment so far reserved for Covid patients in serious danger. However,
competence is not only not a precondition for being White House physician
nowadays – it’s a complete disqualification.
Of course, Trump didn’t just paint his return as a
triumph for him personally in beating Covid-19 (a highly dubious assertion to
make at this point), but as a triumph for the American people. An important part
of his message was that Americans have nothing to fear because we have the best
healthcare system in the world – and he’s right, as long as you overlook the
fact that we’re in the middle among developed countries in terms of life
expectancy and close to the worst in terms of infant mortality. But we are
the runaway champion in one area: the amount we spend on healthcare vs. the return
we get from it in terms of patient outcomes. Nobody comes close to us in this
metric, by a long shot!
One of the big problems is that health care is so
unevenly available in the US, which is a big contributor to differences in life
expectancies. One differentiator is wealth: Residents of the wealthy Streeterville
neighborhood in Chicago have a life expectancy of 90 years, while those in the
poor and overwhelmingly Black Englewood neighborhood (about ten miles away) can
expect to live 60 years.
But another differentiator is urban vs. rural. Residents
of large metropolitan areas can expect
to live 79.1 years, while rural residents on average live 76.7 years. A story
on NPR this morning pointed out that the biggest reason for this was the unavailability
of quality health care to many rural residents due to:
1.
The fact that many of them don’t have health
insurance. This is going to get much worse if the Supreme Court overturns
Obamacare in December, which seems
likely to happen. Some of the worst-impacted states from this will include
West Virginia and Kentucky, where there are large numbers of Obamacare users.
2.
Closing of many rural hospitals in recent years, due
in part to the lack of enough insured patients to pay the bills.
3.
Low availability of broadband internet access, which
is becoming a crucial part of healthcare nowadays.
4.
Lack of free testing sites for Covid-19.
All of these problems have been aggravated under President
Trump, and they will continue to be aggravated if he is re-elected. Yet – at least
until very recently – he has had the overwhelming support of rural residents. You
would think that Trump, after emerging from his gilded, 100% taxpayer-financed
hospital stay, wouldn’t brag about the great healthcare he got, but might
perhaps think about doing more to help his erstwhile fervent supporters who
have anything but that.
Yes, you would certainly think that…
The numbers
These numbers are updated
every day, based on reported US Covid-19 deaths the day before (taken from the
Worldometers.info site, where I’ve been getting my numbers all along). No other
variables go into the projected numbers – they are all projections based on
yesterday’s 7-day rate of increase in total Covid-19 deaths, which was 2.4%.
Note that the “accuracy”
of the projected numbers diminishes greatly after 3-4 weeks. This is because,
up until 3-4 weeks, deaths could in theory be predicted very accurately, if one
knew the real number of cases. In other words, the people who are going to die
in the next 3-4 weeks of Covid-19 are already sick with the disease, even
though they may not know it yet. But this means that the trend in deaths should
be some indicator of the level of infection 3-4 weeks previous.
However, once we get
beyond 3-4 weeks, deaths become more and more dependent on policies and
practices that are put in place – or removed, as is more the case nowadays -
after today (as well as other factors like the widespread availability of an
effective treatment, if not a real “cure”). Yet I still think there’s value in
just trending out the current rate of increase in deaths, since it gives some
indication of what will happen in the near term if there are no significant
intervening changes.
Week ending |
Deaths reported during week/month |
Avg. deaths per day during
week/month |
Deaths as percentage of previous month’s |
March 7 |
18 |
3 |
|
March 14 |
38 |
5 |
|
March 21 |
244 |
35 |
|
March 28 |
1,928 |
275 |
|
Month of March |
4,058 |
131 |
|
April 4 |
6,225 |
889 |
|
April 11 |
12,126 |
1,732 |
|
April 18 |
18,434 |
2,633 |
|
April 25 |
15,251 |
2,179 |
|
Month of April |
59,812 |
1,994 |
1,474% |
May 2 |
13,183 |
1,883 |
|
May 9 |
12,592 |
1,799 |
|
May 16 |
10,073 |
1,439 |
|
May 23 |
8,570 |
1,224 |
|
May 30 |
6,874 |
982 |
|
Month of May |
42,327 |
1,365 |
71% |
June 6 |
6,544 |
935 |
|
June 13 |
5,427 |
775 |
|
June 20 |
4,457 |
637 |
|
June 27 |
6,167 |
881 |
|
Month of June |
23,925 |
798 |
57% |
July 4 |
4,166 |
595 |
|
July 11 |
5,087 |
727 |
|
July 18 |
5,476 |
782 |
|
July 25 |
6,971 |
996 |
|
Month of July |
26,649 |
860 |
111% |
August 1 |
8,069 |
1,153 |
|
August 8 |
7,153 |
1,022 |
|
August 15 |
7,556 |
1,079 |
|
August 22 |
7,552 |
1,079 |
|
August 29 |
6,675 |
954 |
|
Month
of August |
30,970 |
999 |
116% |
September 5 |
5,961 |
852 |
|
September 12 |
5,310 |
759 |
|
September 19 |
5,696 |
814 |
|
September 26 |
5,353 |
765 |
|
Month of Sept. |
22,809 |
760 |
75% |
October 3 |
5,102 |
729 |
|
October 10 |
5,120 |
731 |
|
October 17 |
5,243 |
749 |
|
October 24 |
5,368 |
767 |
|
October 31 |
5,496 |
785 |
|
Month of Oct. |
23,212 |
749 |
102% |
|
233,762 |
|
|
Red = projected
numbers
I. Total deaths
Total US deaths as of
yesterday: 215,822
Deaths reported yesterday:
790
Percent increase in total
deaths in the last seven days: 2.4% (This number is used to project deaths
in the table above. There is a 7-day cycle in the reported deaths numbers,
caused by lack of reporting over the weekends from closed state offices. So this
is the only reliable indicator of a trend in deaths, not the three-day percent
increase I used to focus on, and certainly not the one-day percent increase,
which mainly reflects where we are in the 7-day cycle).
II. Total reported cases
Total US reported cases: 7,722,746
Increase in reported cases
since previous day: 43,660
Percent increase in reported
cases in the last seven days: 4.7%
III. Deaths as a percentage of closed cases so far in the US:
Total Recoveries in US as
of yesterday: 4,936,501
Total Deaths as of yesterday:
215,822
Deaths so far as
percentage of closed cases (=deaths + recoveries): 4.2%
For a discussion of what this
number means – and why it’s so important – see this post. Short
answer: If this percentage declines, that’s good. It’s been steadily declining since
a high of 41% at the end of March. But a good number would be 2%, like South
Korea’s. An OK number would be 4%, like China’s.
IV. 7-day average of
test positive rate for US: 4.7%
For comparison, the recent peak for this rate was 27% in
late July, although the peak in late March was 75%. This is published by Johns
Hopkins. As of 10/2, rate for New York state: 1.2%. For Texas: 6.0%. For
Florida: 10.9%. For Arizona: 6.2%. For
California: 2.8%).
I would love to hear any comments or questions you have
on this post. Drop me an email at tom@tomalrich.com
Comments
Post a Comment