Job number one


It’s good to know that our “long national nightmare” with Donald Trump will (begin to) end on January 20. Of course, now Biden’s transition team needs to get to work, since it has already lost four or five precious days due to the election result not being known for certain until Saturday. It’s disheartening to hear that the head of the GSA is refusing to recognize the truth and provide Biden’s team with the office space, access to agency heads and money that are due them by law (in 2016, Obama’s GSA head did this for Trump’s team the day after the election), but I would fully expect she will do that in a few days, no matter how long her boss decides to wait before acknowledging reality, if he ever does.

But there is one item that can’t wait until this Friday, let alone January 20 – that’s the pandemic. Just last week it would have been going out on a limb to say that the number of daily new Covid cases in the US would soon go over 100,000 and stay there. However, they’ve been over that number since last Tuesday (it seems the novel coronavirus was determined to let people know on election day that it was still around and thriving), and they’ve probably averaged around 115,000 since then. So if anything not only are new cases continuing to surge, the rate at which they’re surging is also increasing.

Measures need to be taken now. Every day lost will mean lots of unnecessary additional deaths (remember, it was calculated that just the one-week delay in enacting lockdowns over most of the country in March cost something like 20,000 deaths). Dr. Ashish Jha of Harvard said on NPR this morning that taking strong measures now (which don’t need to include total lockdowns anywhere), rather than on January 21, could easily save tens of millions of deaths.

Dr. Jha also pointed out that in 2008, after Obama’s first election, his transition team formed a joint committee with George W. Bush’s people to fight the “pandemic” raging that year – the global financial meltdown. Given the number of lives at stake, it would seem completely proper that this year Trump’s and Biden’s team would repeat that action.

Will it happen? I don’t know. But I will say that Republican Congressional leaders should for once do the right thing and make clear they want Trump to cooperate with Biden on the entire transition process, but especially on fighting the coronavirus. If this doesn’t happen, they may pay the price a lot earlier than the next national election in 2022. They may pay it in January in Georgia. And it would be a fitting rebuke.

I would love to hear any comments or questions you have on this post. Drop me an email at tom@tomalrich.com.

 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The tragedy in India

For a great account of what’s going on in India, read this WaPo article. And read this Atlantic article for a good commentary on how India’s wealthier class ignored the lessons of the 1984 Bhopal disaster and let the health care system stagnate, leaving the country unable to handle this sudden surge in the virus. Although it's wrong to say the system stagnated. For the wealthy, it became (and remains) world-class. Does this remind you of another health care system that, at least in the early days of the pandemic, was overwhelmed?  Both articles call attention to the Modi government’s failures, but they both try to spread the blame around. Yes, others are responsible, but the fact that – after a terrible response to the first wave of the virus – the government got lulled into thinking they’d beaten it, so they could open up completely (including holding big political rallies and allowing the annual Kumbh Mela to take place – this year in Haridwar, which I’ve visited and can ...
Read more

The Indian variant

The numbers keep improving every week. Both new cases and deaths grew at the same 0.7% rate in the past week, vs. 0.9% for both cases and deaths the previous week. And average daily deaths in the past week were 573. For perspective, the last time deaths were this low was March 31, 2020. But given that daily deaths hadn’t gone above 10 until March 15, the fact that they’d accelerated to 468 on March 31 was a bad sign (at the time, my big concern was that total deaths would end up in the low tens of thousands. In fact, they passed 600,000 last week). This morning, WaPo ran a story on the new Indian variant’s arrival in Britain, where it passed 2,000 cases recently. It seems to be at least 50% more transmissible than what we used to call the UK variant, but which is now the dominant variant in both the US and Britain. And that variant in turn easily displaced what had been the previous dominant variant in both countries, since the beginning of the pandemic (in fact, I remember a lot o...
Read more

Deaths and Recoveries

I’m not bothering with my usual Numbers section today, since the 1-day and 7-day rates of increase in deaths and cases haven’t changed at all, and the ratio of deaths to closed cases remains at 17%. The projected deaths numbers are close to what they were yesterday. I haven’t discussed the ratio of deaths to closed cases for a while, although I’ve been reporting it. To refresh your memory, this is the ratio of total Covid-19 deaths so far to “closed cases”; closed cases is the sum of deaths so far and “recoveries” so far. The fact that the US rate is 17% means that, of all closed cases so far in the pandemic, 17% of them have resulted in death. This is down substantially from the initial value of 41%, in late March, when Worldometers started reporting recoveries. But it is still quite high – it seems to mean that, if you’re determined to have a “case” of Covid-19, the odds are close to 1 in 5 that you will die. I’ve been periodically comparing the US performance in this ar...
Read more