Not complicated at all!


Kevin Perry sent me this story yesterday about how the Biden team is pondering whether to give Dr. Susan Birx a role in the new administration’s pandemic response team. To quote the article, “’It’s complicated,’ said Céline Gounder, who sits on Biden’s Covid-19 advisory board. ‘It’s almost like she herself has been politicized.’” This is roughly the equivalent of saying “Maybe we should reconsider our idea of appointing Jared Kushner as Chief of Staff. He seems to be a little politicized.”

Of course, there’s no question that Dr. Birx has great technical chops and has done a lot of good work in her position. But there’s also no question that she has done great harm, not due so much to inaction as to her actions and words that had no other effect than to hinder the nation’s response and lead to a lot of needless deaths. Here are some examples from my posts:

The first time I wrote about her was in this post on April 1. I was talking about the fact that what was needed was a total lockdown of the country (rather than the partial state-by-state lockdowns already in place) and that this would save in the millions of lives. But of course that required persuading Donald Trump. Could she do that? I said “Dr. Birx doesn’t even try very hard to change Trump’s mind, as exemplified by her assertion last Thursday that there’s no shortage of ventilators; so she will be no help in this.”

On April 20, I got onto the subject of testing (as I have often done, from the beginning of this blog in March). I said “Trump has declared that not to be a problem (and, disgracefully, Drs. Birx and Fauci seem to support his position, although they didn’t talk that way at all last week)…”

On April 27, I railed against a statement she’d made the previous day:

Of course, if I’m right that the shortage of tests is behind the continuing high level of the ratio of deaths to total cases, then this will be solved when we have adequate tests, right? Yes it would, but now it seems that Dr. Susan Birx is waving the white flag on our ever having adequate tests available, at least tests that detect infections. She said yesterday that what’s needed is a “breakthrough” so that we have antigen tests for Covid-19, which would be a lot easier to administer and require fewer supplies.

I don’t know about you, but I don’t find it very comforting to hear that – three months into the pandemic in the US and at a time when the government’s own guidelines say that widespread availability of testing is crucial to reopening, yet reopening is clearly proceeding anyway – the person in charge of the whole recovery effort is now saying that it will take a small miracle for us to have the tests we need anytime soon.

Dr. Birx, please explain to me exactly why you are in this job, if your chief function now seems to be to deflect blame for anything bad that happens, since clearly a miracle won’t happen. We could hire a faith healer who would do that much more efficiently, and without giving Americans the illusion that at least one or two people at a high level in the government actually know what they’re doing.

On May 4 I asked, neither for the first nor the last time, “Drs. Birx and Fauci, why are you still working for this guy?” It was clear to me that neither of the good Doctors was going to be able to change Trump’s determination to lead the country to ruin. I thought they could have both done a lot more good if they resigned; that might finally wake up Mitch McConnell to the fact that he needed to tell Trump in no uncertain terms that he wouldn’t have any more support in Congress if he didn’t turn the whole coronavirus response over to somebody competent. I still think that might have happened, but we’ll never know now.

On May 21, I asked the rhetorical question “Which poses the greater threat to the US: a) the novel coronavirus, or b) Dr. Susan Birx?” I reiterated her early “no shortage of ventilators” statement, as well as her teaming up with Jared Kushner to push the idea that testing was freely available. Now she seemed to be wholeheartedly joining in Trump’s campaign to convince the public that the real problem wasn’t the virus - it was that the CDC was grossly exaggerating its impact by inflating the number of deaths. In fact, this was the beginning of Trump’s efforts – largely successful – to neutralize the CDC’s previously sterling reputation in the eyes of Americans and the world. And she provided immense help to this effort. Thanks a lot, Dr. Birx!

The last time I mentioned her in a post before today was on September 29, when I discussed her active role in Trump’s campaign – also successful – to get the CDC to change its guidance for school reopening. I concluded by saying:

Dr. Birx was only partially successful in her effort to get the CDC to change their guidance. And of course Trump never had the power to push schools to reopen, since those decisions are controlled on the state and local level (I’ll discuss how badly that can go in another post soon). But I do believe Dr. Birx deserves a medal for valor in the federal War on Children.

She has been a disaster in the White House. The Times made it clear in a great article a couple months ago that, despite having no epidemiological background, she became convinced in April that the virus would disappear very soon. Soon, she was meeting daily with the Chief of Staff and provided the “science” that guided the Trump administration’s disastrous push to get states to reopen before they should have. I thought the best that could be said for her lately was that she had pretty much shut up for the last few months, but now it turns out she was actively working behind the scenes to make sure that the burden of the failed US response to the novel coronavirus was shared as equally as possible between children and adults. After all, kids have the right to endanger their and their families’ health, too - just like adults. 

So my advice to the Biden campaign is “Don’t waste another minute considering whether Susan Birx should be part of your team. Just be very thankful that she isn’t.”

I would love to hear any comments or questions you have on this post. Drop me an email at tom@tomalrich.com.

 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The tragedy in India

For a great account of what’s going on in India, read this WaPo article. And read this Atlantic article for a good commentary on how India’s wealthier class ignored the lessons of the 1984 Bhopal disaster and let the health care system stagnate, leaving the country unable to handle this sudden surge in the virus. Although it's wrong to say the system stagnated. For the wealthy, it became (and remains) world-class. Does this remind you of another health care system that, at least in the early days of the pandemic, was overwhelmed?  Both articles call attention to the Modi government’s failures, but they both try to spread the blame around. Yes, others are responsible, but the fact that – after a terrible response to the first wave of the virus – the government got lulled into thinking they’d beaten it, so they could open up completely (including holding big political rallies and allowing the annual Kumbh Mela to take place – this year in Haridwar, which I’ve visited and can ...
Read more

The Indian variant

The numbers keep improving every week. Both new cases and deaths grew at the same 0.7% rate in the past week, vs. 0.9% for both cases and deaths the previous week. And average daily deaths in the past week were 573. For perspective, the last time deaths were this low was March 31, 2020. But given that daily deaths hadn’t gone above 10 until March 15, the fact that they’d accelerated to 468 on March 31 was a bad sign (at the time, my big concern was that total deaths would end up in the low tens of thousands. In fact, they passed 600,000 last week). This morning, WaPo ran a story on the new Indian variant’s arrival in Britain, where it passed 2,000 cases recently. It seems to be at least 50% more transmissible than what we used to call the UK variant, but which is now the dominant variant in both the US and Britain. And that variant in turn easily displaced what had been the previous dominant variant in both countries, since the beginning of the pandemic (in fact, I remember a lot o...
Read more

Deaths and Recoveries

I’m not bothering with my usual Numbers section today, since the 1-day and 7-day rates of increase in deaths and cases haven’t changed at all, and the ratio of deaths to closed cases remains at 17%. The projected deaths numbers are close to what they were yesterday. I haven’t discussed the ratio of deaths to closed cases for a while, although I’ve been reporting it. To refresh your memory, this is the ratio of total Covid-19 deaths so far to “closed cases”; closed cases is the sum of deaths so far and “recoveries” so far. The fact that the US rate is 17% means that, of all closed cases so far in the pandemic, 17% of them have resulted in death. This is down substantially from the initial value of 41%, in late March, when Worldometers started reporting recoveries. But it is still quite high – it seems to mean that, if you’re determined to have a “case” of Covid-19, the odds are close to 1 in 5 that you will die. I’ve been periodically comparing the US performance in this ar...
Read more